Skip to content

· Private foundation

Two Friends Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$166k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$635kEducation$456kRecreation & Sports$449kReligion$124kPublic Safety & Disaster$61kFood & Nutrition$27kPhilanthropy$11kYouth Development$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bayview Hunters Point YMCA$110,000
Napa Valley State Parks Association$20,000
Napa Valley State Parks Association$20,000
Napa Valley Give Guide$10,970
American Cancer Society$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $475k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Bayview Hunters Point YMCA: $110k → 10%BAYVIEW HUNTERS POINT YMCA: $90k → 10%BAYVIEW HUNTERS POINT YMCA: $79k → 10%BAYVIEW HUNTERS POINT YMCA: $20k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $88k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $88k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Two Friends Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 88%.

Two Friends Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 7 repeat orgs$329k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$1.4M
$318k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+5%

Still filing today

43%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO
    6× · 2019–2025 · $475k · revenue +21%
  • NV
    Napa Valley State Parks Association
    6× · 2018–2025 · $336k · revenue +980% · 31% of their budget
  • NV
    NAPA VALLEY CANDO
    5× · 2019–2024 · $27k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • MY
    Mission YMCA - San Francisco
    one grant, 2018 · $105k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $65k
  • CC
    CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO-SURVIVEERSP PROGRAM SPONSORSHIP
    one grant, 2023 · $61k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSION YMCA: $380,000 · OtherMISSION YMCAHALLELUJAH I HAVE A TESTIMONY INC: $124,050 · OtherHALLELUJAH I HAVE A TESTIMONY INCMission YMCA - San Francisco: $105,000 · OtherMission YMCA - San FranciscoHILLCREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $91,772 · OtherHILLCREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $64,822 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO-SURVIVEERSP PROGRAM SPONSORSHIP: $61,389 · OtherCITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO-SURVIVEERSP PROGRAM SPONSOR…+5 more: $72,470 · Other+5 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $475,456 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIAT…Napa Valley State Parks Association: $335,730 · Public BenefitNapa Valley State Par…Arlene Francis Foundation: $30,000 · EducationTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $8,000 · EducationNAPA VALLEY CANDO: $27,402 · Food & Nutrition
Other$899,503Human Services$475,456Public Benefit$335,730Education$38,000Food & Nutrition$27,402

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $475,456 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNapa Valley State Parks Association: $335,730 over 6y, 31% of budgetArlene Francis Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetNAPA VALLEY CANDO: $27,402 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds Napa Valley State Parks Association ↗
  • Who funds Arlene Francis Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NAPA VALLEY CANDO ↗
  • Who funds THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Two Friends Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Two Friends Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Two Friends’ filings →

    More from the funding graph