· Private foundation
Tuw Prins Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CHURCH | $2,286 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY-TRUST FUND | $2,286 |
| OUR LADY OF LOURDES HOSPITAL | $2,286 |
| WSU FOUNDATION | $2,286 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN WASHINGTON | $2,286 |
| CITY OF PASCO RECREATION SERVIC | $2,286 |
| MID-COLUMBIA LIBRARY | $2,286 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC | $2,286 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $2,286 |
| NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS | $2,286 |
| TRI-CITY UNION GOSPEL MISSION | $2,286 |
| UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO | $2,286 |
| SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN | $2,286 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA | $2,286 |
| LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND | $2,286 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TLTHE LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND INC9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +21%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +33%
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +120%
Funded once
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETYone grant, 2018 · $345 · revenue -11%- UGUNION GOSPEL MISSIONone grant, 2018 · $345
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL NO 604 BLUE MOUNTAIN COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds TRI CITY UNION GOSPEL MISSION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tuw Prins Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.