Skip to content

· Community foundation

Tuscola County Community Foundation

To solicit and collect contributions for charitable, scientific, literary, and educational purposes to benefit the people of and around Tuscola County, Michigan

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.1MPhilanthropy$481kReligion$157kHealth$109kHuman Services$104kScience & Tech$63kPublic Benefit$63kHousing & Shelter$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 42 grants below total $607,981, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,116,591 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $508,610 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $111k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $431k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$10,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Caro Community Schools$66,521
Cass City Public Schools$35,479
Dollywood Foundation$34,695
St Lorenz Lutheran Church & School$31,500
Friends of The Thumb Octagon Barn$26,000
Saginaw Valley State University$25,000
Caro Area District Library$21,357
Covenant Healthcare FoundationVisi$21,000
Field Neuroscience InstituteMyMich$21,000
Thumb Octagon Barn Agricultural Mus$21,000
Caro United Methodist Church Good$20,000
Leader Dogs for the Blind$18,900
Individual grant recipient$18,900
Shriners Hospital for Children$18,900
St Jude Childrens Hospital$16,800
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 37 repeat orgs$658k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
30

Total granted

$2.1M
$316k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $341k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DF
    DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $345k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2019–2020 · $302k
  • CC
    Caro Community Schools
    7× · 2017–2025 · $266k

Funded once

  • VO
    VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS
    one grant, 2018 · $62k
  • CM
    Caro Masonic Mt Moriah Lodge
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k
  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF TUSCOLA CO
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $344,703 · OtherDOLLYWOOD FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $301,735 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCaro Community Schools: $266,425 · OtherCaro Community SchoolsCass City Public Schools: $166,309 · OtherCass City Public Schools+90 more: $1,728,439 · Other+90 more
Other$2,807,611

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tuscola County’s filings →

More from the funding graph