Skip to content

· Public charity

Turtle Conservancy

The TURTLE CONSERVANCY is dedicated to protecting threatened turtles and tortoises and their habitats worldwide, and to promoting their appreciation by people.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$62k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$458kEnvironment$213kScience & Tech$10k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $177,590, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,086,398 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $908,808 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
$35,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE OCEAN FOUNDATION$61,960
REWILD$53,130
DUKE UNIVERSITY$35,000
CHELONIAN RESEARCH FOUNDATION$17,500
TURNER ENDANGERED SPECIES LLC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 49% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%TURNER CONSERVATION TRUST: $20k → 10%THE TERRAPIN NESTING PROJECT: $3k → 7%THE TURTLE ROOM: $1k → 9%VILDWERK FONDATION INC: $28k → 17%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 11%RAINFOREST TRUST: $113k → 6%CHELONIAN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%TURNER CONSERVATION TRUST: $20k → 10%THE TERRAPIN NESTING PROJECT: $1k → 7%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 11%RAINFOREST TRUST: $63k → 6%TURNER CONSERVATION TRUST: $20k → 10%RAINFOREST TRUST: $50k → 6%TURNER CONSERVATION TRUST: $20k → 10%TURNER ENDANGERED SPECIES LLC: $10k → 10%TURNER ENDANGERED SPECIES LLC: $10k → 10%TURNER CONSERVATION TRUST: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $906k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$723k · 80% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: OPERATING OF LAND PRESEVE

Sub-Saharan Africa$174k · 19% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: TO ASSIST WITH THE GEOMETRIC TORTOISE PROJECT

South Asia$8k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: KFI DUMARO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 50% of Turtle Conservancy’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Turtle Conservancylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 45% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$509k · 6 repeat orgs$171k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$509k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+85%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalAnimalsPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    RAINFOREST TRUST
    2× · 2018–2019 · $226k · revenue -13%
  • REWILD
    2× · 2019–2022 · $100k · revenue +243%
  • TC
    TURNER CONSERVATION TRUST CO WILMINGTON TRUST - SUZANNE MARKMAN
    5× · 2017–2021 · $90k · revenue -57%

Funded once

  • VF
    VILDWERK FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $28k · revenue +85%
  • CR
    CHELONIAN RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +8%
  • T
    THETURTLEROOM
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAINFOREST TRUST: $225,875 · InternationalRAINFOREST TRUSTTHE OCEAN FOUNDATION: $61,960 · OtherTHE OCEAN FOUNDATIONREWILD: $53,130 · OtherREWILDTURNER ENDANGERED SPECIES FUND: $20,000 · OtherTURNER ENDANGERED SPECIES F…CHELONIAN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $17,500 · OtherCHELONIAN RESEARCH FOUNDATI…CHELONIAN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherCHELONIAN RESEARCH FOUNDATI…+2 more: $4,500 · OtherREWILD: $100,080 · AnimalsREWILDTURNER CONSERVATION TRUST CO WILMINGTON TRUST - SUZANNE MARKMAN: $90,000 · PhilanthropyTURNER CONSERV…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVER…VILDWERK FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 · Arts & Culture
International$225,875Other$167,090Animals$100,080Philanthropy$90,000Education$70,000Arts & Culture$27,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $225,875 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetREWILD: $100,080 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTURNER CONSERVATION TRUST CO WILMINGTON TRUST - SUZANNE MARKMAN: $90,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHELONIAN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
  • Who funds REWILD ↗
  • Who funds TURNER CONSERVATION TRUST CO WILMINGTON TRUST - SUZANNE MARKMAN ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VILDWERK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHELONIAN RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Turtle Conservancy funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Turtle Conservancy. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Chelonian Research Foundation: 16% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Turtle Conservancy’s filings →

More from the funding graph