Skip to content
Tua Welsh Family Crut at a glance

· Private foundation

Tua Welsh Family Crut

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$466k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$117k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$512kAnimals$180kHealth$117kPhilanthropy$90k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $326k
$93,243
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC MEMORIAL HOME$116,553
AUXILIARY OF CHARLTON MEMORIAL H$116,553
ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF FALL RIV$93,243
MARINE MUSEUM AT FALL RIVER INC$46,622
UNITED WAY OF GREATER FALL RIVER$46,622
FALL RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY$46,622
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AUXILIARY OF CHARLTON MEMORIAL H: $216k → 11%CATHOLIC MEMORIAL HOME: $117k → 11%AUXILIARY OF CHARLTON MEMORIAL H: $117k → 11%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF FALL RIV: $93k → 11%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF FALL RIV: $86k → 11%FALL RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $47k → 11%FALL RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $43k → 11%MARINE MUSEUM AT FALL RIVER INC: $47k → 11%MARINE MUSEUM AT FALL RIVER INC: $43k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$782k · 5 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
1

Total granted

$782k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
0%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $117k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    AUXILIARY OF CHARLTON MEMORIAL H
    2× · 2023–2024 · $333k
  • AR
    ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF FALL RIVER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $180k · revenue +84%
  • TM
    THE MARINE MUSEUM AT FALL RIVER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $90k

Funded once

  • CM
    CATHOLIC MEMORIAL HOME INC
    one grant, 2024 · $117k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUXILIARY OF CHARLTON MEMORIAL H: $332,595 · OtherAUXILIARY OF CHARLTON MEMORIAL HANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF FALL RIVER: $179,660 · OtherANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF FALL RIVERTHE MARINE MUSEUM AT FALL RIVER INC: $89,831 · OtherTHE MARINE MUSEUM AT FALL RIVER INCUNITED WAY OF GREATER FALL RIVER INC: $89,831 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER FALL RIVER INCCATHOLIC MEMORIAL HOME INC: $116,553 · HealthCATHOLIC MEMOR…Fall River Historical Society: $89,831 · Arts & CultureFall River …
Other$691,917Health$116,553Arts & Culture$89,831

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF FALL RIVER: $179,660 over 2y, 21% of budgetCATHOLIC MEMORIAL HOME INC: $116,553 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER FALL RIVER INC: $89,831 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetFall River Historical Society: $89,831 over 2y, 4.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Grimshaw-Gudewicz Cha…
Grimshaw-Gudewicz Charitable Foundation A Shabshelowitz Co-TrusteeMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grimshaw-Gudewicz Charitable Foundation A Shabshelowitz Co-Trustee

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tua Welsh Family Crut funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tua Welsh Family Crut. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 42%
  • Catholic Memorial Home Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Fall River Historical Society: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tua Welsh Family Crut’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home