Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tua Aspiring Angels Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$175k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$265kHealth$247kAnimals$160kScience & Tech$147kCrime & Legal$55k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$40,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARINGBRIDGE$40,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$40,000
BOYS TOWN$40,000
CRADLE SOCIETY$35,000
PAWS CHICAGO$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $55k → 12%CANINE COMPANIONS: $20k → 15%BOYS TOWN: $40k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $40k → 12%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $25k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$586k · 6 repeat orgs$287k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +76% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$586k
$192k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+76%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
    3× · 2023–2025 · $135k · revenue +9%
  • PP
    Planned Parenthood of Illinois
    3× · 2020–2022 · $85k · revenue +77%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $80k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • C
    CASA
    one grant, 2024 · $55k
  • CU
    CARE USA
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $42k · revenue +8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
3
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Ann & robert h. lurie children's hospital of chicago is dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a…

Health
4
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
5
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
6
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
7
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
8
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
9
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
10
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
11
Upmc Carlisle

Upmc carlisle's mission is to serve the community by providing access to outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health care system through clinical and technological innovation, research and education.

Health
12
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cradles to Crayons Inc and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $147,000 · OtherSEARCH DOG FOUNDATIONHARMONY HOUSE FOR CATS — $94,667 · OtherHARMONY HOUSE FOR CATSCASA — $54,666 · OtherCASACARE USA — $50,000 · OtherCARE USAThe Cradle Society — $35,000 · OtherThe Cradle SocietyPlanned Parenthood of Illinois — $85,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood of IllinoisST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $80,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSP…MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $42,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION I…CaringBridge — $40,000 · HealthCaringBridgeFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $134,667 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' H…CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INCCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR IND…PAWS CHICAGO — $20,000 · AnimalsTOUCHED BY AN ANIMAL — $15,000 · AnimalsYOUNG AT HEART SENIOR PET ADOPTIONS — $10,000 · Animals
Other$381,333Health$247,000Human Services$199,667Animals$45,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $134,667 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Illinois — $85,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $42,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCaringBridge — $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Cradle Society — $35,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOUCHED BY AN ANIMAL — $15,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetYOUNG AT HEART SENIOR PET ADOPTIONS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tua Aspiring Angels Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph