Skip to content
Ttee Uw of Frank M Noonan at a glance

· Private foundation

Ttee Uw of Frank M Noonan

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$556k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$158k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.7MHealth$1.4MCrime & Legal$240kEmployment$160k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$80,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Northeastern University$158,275
Jewish Vocational Service Inc$80,000
THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORP$80,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION$80,000
Trustees of Boston University$79,972
BOSTON COLLEGE TRUSTEES$78,222
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOSTON COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $78k → 7%TRIANGLE INC - THE MEDICAL: $80k → 8%Northeastern University: $158k → 16%BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER: $66k → 17%Emory University: $80k → 14%BOSTON COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $77k → 7%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $160k → 8%Northeastern University: $80k → 16%BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER: $53k → 17%MAY INSTITUTE INC: $80k → 7%TRIANGLE INC - THE MEDICAL: $80k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $80k → 16%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $155k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $80k → 16%TRIANGLE INC - THE MEDICAL: $80k → 8%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $80k → 16%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $71k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $160k → 16%University of Massachusetts Foundation: $80k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $160k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $80k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $80k → 16%BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $160k → 16%BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $160k → 16%BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $80k → 16%BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $80k → 16%HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION: $30k → 16%Trustees of Boston University: $160k → 16%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL: $80k → 16%Trustees of Boston University: $80k → 16%THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORP: $80k → 16%Jewish Vocational Service Inc: $80k → 16%Jewish Vocational Service Inc: $80k → 16%FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN WITH: $80k → 16%FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN WITH: $80k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 12 repeat orgs$510k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$3.1M
$430k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+69%

Still filing today

67%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $480k · revenue +58%
  • Trustees of Tufts College
    4× · 2020–2023 · $467k · revenue +39%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $240k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • MG
    MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL
    one grant, 2017 · $160k
  • TM
    THE MAY INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $80k · revenue +25%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $80k · revenue +69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
5
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
6
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
9
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
10
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
University of Massachusetts Global

The mission of umass global is to provide students with an accessible inclusive, and transformative education based on excellence and flexibility, creating lasting value and relevance for a dynamic world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Boston University; the most unlike its peers is Health Resources in Action Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $479,876 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTSTRIANGLE INC - THE MEDICAL: $240,000 · OtherTRIANGLE INC - THE MEDICALTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $239,944 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL: $160,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERALIndividual grant recipient: $160,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFEDERATION FOR CHILDREN WITH: $160,000 · OtherFEDERATION FOR CHILDREN WITHMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $80,000 · Other+1 more: $30,000 · OtherTrustees of Tufts College: $466,836 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $238,275 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $154,924 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC: $79,995 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUN…Emory University: $79,972 · EducationEmory UniversityBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $479,975 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORP…Children's Hospital Corporation: $160,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corpor…BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER: $118,942 · HealthBETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTERTHE MAY INSTITUTE INC: $80,000 · HealthTHE MAY INSTITUTE INCJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC: $160,000 · Employment
Other$1,549,820Education$1,020,002Health$838,917Employment$160,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $479,975 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $466,836 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $239,944 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $238,275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC: $160,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $160,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $154,924 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER: $118,942 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAY INSTITUTE INC: $80,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC: $79,995 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEmory University: $79,972 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ttee Uw of Frank M Noonan funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ttee Uw of Frank M Noonan. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • The May Institute Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Health Resources in Action Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Jewish Vocational Service Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ttee Uw of Frank M Noonan’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home