Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Trudy W and Paul V Lombardi Jr Family Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2019
8
Grants FY2019
4
States reached
$2k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

95% of Trudy W and Paul V Lombardi Jr Family Foundation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Trudy W and Paul V Lombardi Jr Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $9k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
17
4
18
5
19
4
20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Philanthropy$251kEducation$13kHuman Services$11kHealth$10kCommunity Improvement$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$1k
02FY2019 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DONATIONS UNDER 1000$2,150
BOULDER CREST RETREAT$1,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$1,250
CODE OF SUPPORT FOUNDATION$1,000
ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,000
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FND$1,000
SUNY MARITIME FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOULDER CREST RETREAT: $2k → 7%CODE OF SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%BOULDER CREST RETREAT: $2k → 7%CODE OF SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%Code of Support Foundation: $1k → 9%Code of Support Foundation: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$39k · 10 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$39k
$1k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $3k · revenue +207%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +33%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • GM
    GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FND
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
Saint John's Cancer Institute

To support research and development of, and education in, the basic and clinical sciences for the prevention, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.

Health
7
Military Health Research Foundation Inc

The military health research foundation(mhrf) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to the advancement of military medical research to benefit the health and safety of the men and women of the united states armed forces.

Science & Tech
8
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
9
Prostate Cancer Foundation

The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…

Philanthropy
10
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

11
American College of Surgeons

The american college of surgeons is dedicated to improving the care of the surgical patient and to safeguarding standards of care in an optimal and ethical practice environment.

Education
12
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund and the most unlike its peers is Code of Support Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $248,017 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND+1 more — $2,500 · Community ImprovementDonations under 1000 — $6,530 · OtherDonations…NVTC FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherNVTC FOUN…ARDSLEY HIGH SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherARDSLEY H…Individual grant recipient — $4,200 · OtherIndividua…EASTER SEALS INC — $3,500 · OtherEASTER SE…GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FND — $1,000 · OtherCode of Support Foundation — $4,000 · Human ServicesBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Heart Association Inc — $2,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,250 · HealthSUNY MARITIME FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 · Education
Community Improvement$250,517Other$25,230Human Services$7,000Health$4,750Education$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $248,017 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCode of Support Foundation — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUNY MARITIME FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMCLEAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds Code of Support Foundation
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC
  • Who funds BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SUNY MARITIME FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MCLEAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Trudy W and Paul V Lombardi Jr Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Trudy W and Paul V Lombardi Jr Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Trudy W and Paul V Lombardi Jr Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph