Skip to content

· Community foundation

Tri-County Community Foundation

To encourage and promote philanthropic giving

$328k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$82k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$1.1MInternational$403kCommunity Improvement$259kEducation$203kHuman Services$120kPublic Benefit$98kRecreation & Sports$91k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $276,620, the rows itemized in this filing. The $327,804 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $51,184 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $141k
$32,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BARNWELL SCHOOL DISTRICT 45 EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRAM$82,147
HEALTHY LEARNERS$58,991
BARNWELL COUNTY 1ST STEPS$42,367
VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA$32,500
IMAGINATION LIBRARY SC-BARNWELL COUNTY$28,865
CREATIVE KIDZ LEARNING ACADEMY$16,050
BARNWELL COUNTY FAMILY YMCA$15,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HEALTHY LEARNERS: $59k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 9 repeat orgs$351k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$1.9M
$90k

Still filing today

44%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $261k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $403k · revenue +11%
  • DI
    DREAMS IMAGINATION & GIFT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM DIG
    5× · 2018–2023 · $259k · revenue +315% · 33% of their budget
  • PP
    PALMETTO PROJECT INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $55k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • DT
    Denmark Technical College
    2× · 2019–2023 · $33k
  • SC
    Sweetwater Coountry Club Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • AO
    Axis One Center of Barnwell
    one grant, 2023 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Barnwell County 1st Steps Ptrshp: $863,186 · OtherBarnwell County 1st Steps PtrshpBarnwell County 1st Steps Prrshp: $139,039 · OtherBarnwell County 1st Steps PrrshpBARNWELL SCHOOL DISTRICT 45 EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRAM: $82,147 · OtherBARNWELL SCHOOL DISTRICT 45 EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRAMSweetwater Country Club Inc: $66,000 · OtherPALMETTO PROJECT INC: $55,383 · Other+10 more: $273,549 · Other+10 moreSave The Children Federation Inc: $402,818 · InternationalSave The Children Fe…DREAMS IMAGINATION & GIFT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM DIG: $259,000 · Youth DevelopmentDREAMS IMAGIN…HEALTHY LEARNERS: $58,991 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE: $35,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,479,304International$402,818Youth Development$259,000Human Services$58,991Housing & Shelter$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $402,818 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDREAMS IMAGINATION & GIFT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM DIG: $259,000 over 5y, 33% of budgetPALMETTO PROJECT INC: $55,383 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DREAMS IMAGINATION & GIFT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM DIG ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY LEARNERS ↗
  • Who funds PALMETTO PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tri-County Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tri-County Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tri-County Community Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tri-County Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tri-County’s filings →

More from the funding graph