Skip to content

· Public charity

Tri City Economic Development Corporation

To reduce the waste stream, employ disadvantaged youth and adults, and share residual proceeds with the community.

$59k
Granted FY2017
3
Grants FY2017
—
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $41,903, the rows itemized in this filing. The $58,520 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,617 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
$10,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF UNION CITY$26,903
ALAMEDA LABOR COUNCIL$10,000
EAST BAY LA RAZA LAWYERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$5,000
02Its field
02the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2017.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2017, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 3 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF UNION CITY: $26,903 · OtherCITY OF UNION CITYALAMEDA LABOR COUNCIL: $10,000 · OtherALAMEDA LABOR COUNCILEAST BAY LA RAZA LAWYERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5,000 · OtherEAST BAY LA RAZA LAWYERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND
Other$41,903

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $5k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2017, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tri City Economic Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph