Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Tennessee · Public charity

Trevecca Nazarene University

Trevecca Nazarene University is a private, co-educational, christian liberal arts university. The university exists to carry out the educational mission of the church by means of academic programs that promote scholarship, critical reflection, thoughtful worship, and the preparation of students for lives of meaningful service in various…

$23M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$13k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$12,884
Largest grant, FY2024
$12,884
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$238M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$30k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
General Board of Church of the Nazarene Tr$16,6201n/a
Nashville Trevecca Community Church of the Nazarene$12,8841n/a

Compare Trevecca Nazarene University with peer funders

About Trevecca Nazarene University

How much does Trevecca Nazarene University give?
Trevecca Nazarene University reported 1 itemized grants totaling $12,884, out of $22,629,868 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Trevecca Nazarene University fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (100%).
Who are Trevecca Nazarene University's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2024: General Board of Church of the Nazarene Tr ($17k), Nashville Trevecca Community Church of the Nazarene ($13k).
Where is Trevecca Nazarene University based?
Trevecca Nazarene University is based in TN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $26M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Trevecca Nazarene University’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home