Skip to content
Tr Uw Rachel Fiero Clarke Up 12 The at a glance

· Private foundation

Tr Uw Rachel Fiero Clarke Up 12 The

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$494kReligion$9kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$7,500
SUNY NEW PALTZ$7,500
RUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE$6,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$6,000
SUNY ONEONTA$6,000
PACE UNIVERSITY$4,500
UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY$4,500
HOUGHTON UNIVERSITY$3,000
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND$3,000
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE$3,000
SIENA COLLEGE$3,000
SUNY PLATTSBURGH$3,000
SUNY OSWEGO$3,000
JACKSONVILLE UNIVERSITY$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BARD COLLEGE: $2k → 9%IONA COLLEGE: $2k → 9%COLUMBIA GREEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 11%ST JOHNS UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%RUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE: $3k → 11%SUNY ONEONTA: $1k → 13%NAZARETH COLLEGE: $1k → 14%COLLEGE OF SAINT ROSE: $2k → 14%SUNY CORTLAND: $1k → 15%PACE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%SUNY OSWEGO: $3k → 17%SUNY POTSDAM: $1k → 18%SUNY FREDONIA: $625 → 18%UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $1k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $1k → 13%MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY: $1k → 6%MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE: $1k → 9%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $1k → 11%SIENNA COLLEGE: $625 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
VA
TN
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$392k · 28 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
7

Total granted

$392k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+13%

Still filing today

57%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PU
    PACE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $26k · revenue +14%
  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $26k · revenue +6%
  • IU
    IONA UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $22k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • CH
    CATSKILL HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
4
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
5
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
6
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
7
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
8
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
9
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
10
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
11
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
12
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University; the most unlike its peers is St John's University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PACE UNIVERSITY: $25,750 · EducationPACE UNIVERSITYNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $25,500 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYIONA UNIVERSITY: $22,250 · EducationIONA UNIVERSITYTHE COLLEGE OF SAINT ROSE: $21,875 · EducationTHE COLLEGE OF SAINT ROSERUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE: $21,500 · EducationRUSSELL SAGE COLLEGERensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $17,250 · EducationRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $13,250 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGEITHACA COLLEGE: $13,000 · EducationSt John's University: $9,375 · EducationMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC: $9,125 · EducationBARD COLLEGE: $9,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $9,000 · EducationSPRINGFIELD COLLEGE: $9,000 · Education+11 more: $38,625 · Education+11 moreSUNY ALBANY: $27,625 · OtherSUNY ALBANYCOLUMBIA GREEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $23,975 · OtherCOLUMBIA GREEN COMMUNITY COLLEGESUNY NEW PALTZ: $23,500 · OtherSUNY NEW PALTZSUNY ONEONTA: $20,250 · OtherSUNY ONEONTASUNY PLATTSBURGH: $14,000 · OtherSUNY PLATTSBURGHUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $13,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLANDSUNY OSWEGO: $12,875 · OtherSUNY OSWEGOSUNY CORTLAND: $12,750 · OtherSUNY CORTLANDUNIVERSITY AT ALBANY: $7,625 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $7,250 · Other+10 more: $30,325 · Other+10 more
Education$244,500Other$193,175

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPACE UNIVERSITY: $25,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $25,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIONA UNIVERSITY: $22,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF SAINT ROSE: $21,875 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE: $21,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $17,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $13,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetITHACA COLLEGE: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSt John's University: $9,375 over 2y, 20% of budgetMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC: $9,125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD COLLEGE: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIENA UNIVERSITY: $6,625 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAZARETH UNIVERSITY: $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $4,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUGHTON UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJacksonville University: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PACE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds IONA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF SAINT ROSE ↗
  • Who funds RUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ITHACA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds St John's University ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SIENA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds NAZARETH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOUGHTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Jacksonville University ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ehlermann-Fedderke De…Gazin Norbert L Educa…
Ehlermann-Fedderke Descendants FoundationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ehlermann-Fedderke Descendants Foundation · Gazin Norbert L Education Pfdn 101-0628960

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tr Uw Rachel Fiero Clarke Up 12 The funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tr Uw Rachel Fiero Clarke Up 12 The. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 4% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 2% of income from government
  • Jacksonville University: 1% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 0% of income from government
  • Monmouth University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Springfield College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tr Uw Rachel Fiero Clarke Up 12 The’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home