Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tr Charmgoodloe Yancey Fdn Uw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$144k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$585kRecreation & Sports$44kHealth$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEGAN SIMMONS CO WINTHROP UNIVERSITY$3,500
SCOUT SUMMERLIN CO UNIV OF GEORGIA$3,500
ALAINA CALLAWAY CO UNIV OF GEORGIA$3,500
ANNA CRUICKSHANK CO GEORGIA COLLEGE AND$3,500
CALEB GRINER CO ABRAHAM BALDWIN$3,500
TALIA EVANS CO FORT VALLEY UNIVERSITY$3,500
AMAYA ACHEOCHE CO SOUTH GEORGIA STATE$3,500
WHITNEY DAWSON CO GORDON STATE COLLEGE$3,500
ANTHONY NICHOLS CO LANIER TECHNICAL$3,500
ASHLEY BRASSELL CO TEXAS TECH UNIV$3,500
SYDNEY STEPHENS CO UNIV OF SC-AIKEN$3,500
EMILY C BARKER CO GA NORTHWESTERN TECH$3,500
AMANDA MOORE CO UNIV OF GEORGIA$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,500
EVAN RATLIFF -COLLEGE OF COASTAL GEORGIA$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%MEGAN SIMMONS CO WINTHROP UNIVERSITY: $4k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF SC-AIKEN: $4k → 17%EVAN ERSKA CO UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA: $4k → 13%LAWTON HICKOX CO AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%JARED SMITH CO JACKSONVILLE STATE: $4k → 19%FRANCESCA LUMPP CO NORTHEAST ALABAMA: $4k → 19%DANIELLE ZEFF CO WARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $4k → 12%ELLA GIBSON CO APPALACHIAN STATE UNIV: $4k → 21%NICHOLAS CLEMENS CO KENNESAW STATE UNIV: $4k → 8%ANTHONY NICHOLS CO LANIER TECHNICAL: $4k → 12%JOSEPH GLOVER CO UNIV OF NORTH GEORGIA: $4k → 12%SHEPHERD CENTER: $16k → 13%WHITNEY DAWSON CO GORDON STATE COLLEGE: $4k → 13%WILLIAM HAMILTON - UNIV OF WEST GEORGIA: $4k → 13%EVAN RATLIFF -COLLEGE OF COASTAL GEORGIA: $4k → 14%EMILY C BARKER CO GA NORTHWESTERN TECH: $4k → 15%CALEB GRINER CO ABRAHAM BALDWIN: $4k → 17%TALIA EVANS CO FORT VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $4k → 18%SOUTHERN CRESCENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $4k → 19%AMAYA ACHEOCHE CO SOUTH GEORGIA STATE: $4k → 20%CARSON CLENNEY CO GEORGIA SOUTHERN: $4k → 24%KELLEN O'NEIL - GEORGIA COLLEGE & STATE: $4k → 24%JOHN LANE CO MIDDLE GEORGIA STATE UNIV: $4k → 24%BRADEN ERKSA CO UNIV OF MARYLAND: $4k → 11%SYDNEY STEPHENS CO UNIV OF SC-AIKEN: $4k → 17%NANCY JANE DAVIS CO AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%KAYLEE NIKOLOPOULUS - JACKSONVILLE STATE: $4k → 19%WYATT L MUELLER CO KENNESAW STATE UNIV: $4k → 8%JACKSON LANKFORD - UNIV OF NORTH GEORGIA: $4k → 12%ROY CALDWELL JR CO UNIV OF WEST GE: $4k → 13%COLLEGE OF COASTAL GEORGIA: $4k → 14%SOUTHERN CRESCENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $4k → 19%JAYLA BURGESS CO GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIV: $4k → 24%ANNA CRUICKSHANK CO GEORGIA COLLEGE AND: $4k → 24%ALYSSA G WARWICK CO UNIV OF GEORGIA: $4k → 27%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF SC-AIKEN: $4k → 17%CONOR ONEIL CO UNIV OF NORTH GEORG: $4k → 12%KYLE ALDRIDGE CO UNIV OF WEST GEORGIA: $4k → 13%EVAN RATLIFF: $4k → 14%TAYLOR PRUITT CO GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIV: $4k → 24%AMANDA MOORE CO UNIV OF GEORGIA: $4k → 27%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $4k → 11%TYLER GRINER CO GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIV: $4k → 12%KENDALL ROGERS CO UNIV OF GEORGIA: $4k → 27%ALAINA CALLAWAY CO UNIV OF GEORGIA: $4k → 27%SCOUT SUMMERLIN CO UNIV OF GEORGIA: $4k → 27%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MA
CA
UT
MO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$304k · 18 repeat orgs$348k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
59

Total granted

$304k
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+19%

Still filing today

6%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $144k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WEST GEORGIA
    4× · 2020–2023 · $49k
  • KS
    KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $49k
  • VS
    VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $37k

Funded once

  • SC
    SHEPHERD CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $16k · revenue +22%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Georgia Southern University Foundation Inc

The Georgia Southern University Foundation was established in 1963 to receive, manage, and administer private gifts in support of the Georgia Southern University mission and priorities. The Foundation primarily accomplishes this mission by…

Education
2
Valdosta State University Foundation Inc

The Foundation exists to support development of educational excellence at Valdosta State University.

Education
3
Columbus State University Foundation Inc

The Columbus State University Foundation supports educational excellence and the expansion of educational opportunities at Columbus State University. The Foundation attracts, receives, invests, manages, and expends gifts and other…

Education
4
Jackson State University Development Foundation Inc

To provide financial support to the JSU academic programs, student scholarships as well as general university support.

Education
5
Uga Real Estate Foundation Inc

The UGA Real Estate Foundation, Inc. manages and improves various real estate assets for the benefit of the University of Georgia, governed by the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia. The UGA Real Estate Foundation may…

Philanthropy
6
Albany State University Foundation Inc

To provide financial aid to students and financial support of Albany State University, its faculty, staff, research, and advancement of higher education.

Public Benefit
7
South Georgia State College Foundation Inc

The mission of the South Georgia State College Foundation, Inc. is to help transform and enhance the lives of our diverse student population.

Education
8
University System of Georgia Foundation Inc & Affiliates

See schedule o for complete mission description.

Education
9
The Northeastern State University

The Foundation was created exclusively to benefit Northeastern State University.

Education
10
Georgia College & State University Alumni Association Inc

To encourage, solicit, receive and administer gifts and bequests of property and funds for the scientific, educational and charitable purposes for the advancement of georgia college & state university.

Education
11
Georgia State University Foundation Inc

Support the mission and best interests of Georgia State University.

Education
12
Central Georgia Technical College Foundation Inc

To provide private funding for capital expansion and improvements, equipment, staff and faculty development, scholarships and endowments.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of West Georgia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cleveland State Community College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
6/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WEST GEORGIA: $49,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WEST GEORGIAKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY: $48,500 · OtherKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITYVALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $37,000 · OtherVALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $33,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIAGEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $23,500 · OtherAUGUSTA UNIVERSITY: $21,000 · Other+108 more: $412,000 · Other+108 moreSHEPHERD CENTER INC: $16,000 · HealthPOINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $4,500 · EducationROCHESTER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEG: $3,500 · EducationGrand Canyon University: $3,500 · Education
Other$624,500Health$16,000Education$11,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHEPHERD CENTER INC: $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCHESTER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEG: $3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOGEECHEE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPOINT UNIVERSITY INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds POINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tr Charmgoodloe Yancey Fdn Uw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tr Charmgoodloe Yancey Fdn Uw. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tr Charmgoodloe Yancey Fdn Uw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph