Skip to content
Toufic Srour Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Toufic Srour Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$386kEducation$4kFood & Nutrition$4kHuman Services$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kPhilanthropy$720International$501Health$332Other$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$801
Median grant
3
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEPHARDIC LEBANESE CONGREGATION$15,255
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,482
CONGREGATION BETH YOSEF$1,101
KEREN YOM TOV$1,000
YESHIVAT KETER TORAH$801
Individual grant recipient$501
CONGREGATION BET SHMUEL$501
Individual grant recipient$500
SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK$360
EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE$360
BNEI ARAM SOBA$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK: $720 → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $360 → 20%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK: $360 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$352k · 30 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
44

Total granted

$352k
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+52%

Still filing today

20%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $501 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationFood & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $8k · revenue +138%
  • YK
    YESHIVA KETER TORAH INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $4k · revenue +111%
  • SC
    SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • YS
    YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $32k · revenue +10%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
  • YH
    YAM HATORAH
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
5
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
6
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
7
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
8
Congregation Jewish Spiritual Shabbas Inc
Religion
9
Rashbi Tehillim Incorporated
Religion
10
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
11
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Yeshivas Nachlas Bnei Shimon

To provide financial assistance to jewish educational and charitable causes.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Shaare Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ilan High School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION BETH MIDRASH YAM HATORAH: $133,813 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH MIDRASH YAM HATORAHSEPHARDIC LEBANESE CONGREGATION INC: $124,894 · OtherSEPHARDIC LEBANESE CONGREGATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $23,345 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+58 more: $125,850 · Other+58 moreYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $32,000 · EducationYESHIVAT …MATTAN BASSETER INC: $3,653 · EducationMATTAN BA…YESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $3,553 · EducationYESHIVA K…+1 more: $201 · EducationCONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $3,800 · ReligionKEREN YOM TOV INC: $2,000 · ReligionTORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD: $1,950 · ReligionNACHLAT MEIR INSTITUTIONS INC DBA NETIVEY HATORA INSTITUTIONS: $900 · ReligionAmerican Friends of Chabad Lubavitch Aruba INC: $360 · ReligionAHAVAT CHINAM INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $908 · Food & NutritionSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $1,440 · Human ServicesDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $201 · Youth DevelopmentCHAI LIFELINE INC: $80 · Health
Other$407,902Education$39,407Religion$9,010Food & Nutrition$3,908Human Services$1,440Youth Development$201Health$80

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $32,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES: $7,554 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $3,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMATTAN BASSETER INC: $3,653 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $3,553 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN YOM TOV INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD: $1,950 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $1,440 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $908 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNACHLAT MEIR INSTITUTIONS INC DBA NETIVEY HATORA INSTITUTIONS: $900 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Friends of Chabad Lubavitch Aruba INC: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $201 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $201 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $152 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $80 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC ↗
  • Who funds MATTAN BASSETER INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA KETER TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAT CHINAM INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN YOM TOV INC ↗
  • Who funds TORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…Jewish Communal FundThe Howard Hoffman & …The Setton FoundationRalph J Harary Founda…Isaac & Marjorie Gind…The Madeb Family Foun…The Ralph S Gindi Fam…Cabasso Family Founda…The Amin and Lillian …Reuben J Chehebar Cha…Jack D Cohen Foundati…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY49.7× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · The Madeb Family Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Reuben J Chehebar Charitable Trust Reuben J Chehebar Trustee · Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Toufic Srour Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Toufic Srour Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Toufic Srour’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home