Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

North Carolina · Public charity

Together We Feed

Together We Feed is a nonprofit organization dedicated to feeding high risk children suffering from hunger in the Charlotte Mecklenburg Metropolitan area of North Carolina. The organization works through its local food bank and school systems to provide food to children in need.

$455k
Granted FY2017
4
Itemized grants FY2017
4
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2017
$438k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2017
$25,944
Largest grant, FY2017
$387,786
States reached, FY2017
1

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc$387,78610%
Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools$25,9441n/a
Creative Player Sports Foundation$12,852146%
Junior Achievement of Central Carolinas Inc$11,16011%

Compare Together We Feed with peer funders

About Together We Feed

How much does Together We Feed give?
Together We Feed reported 4 itemized grants totaling $437,742, out of $455,224 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does Together We Feed fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (95%), Recreation & Sports (3%), Youth Development (3%).
Who are Together We Feed's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc ($388k), Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools ($26k), Creative Player Sports Foundation ($13k).
Where is Together We Feed based?
Together We Feed is based in NC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home