Skip to content
To Preach the Gospel at a glance

· Private foundation

To Preach the Gospel

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$900k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$5.9MEducation$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $160k
  • $250k+1 grant · $900k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TARA CHURCH OF CHRIST$900,000
MARION CHURCH OF CHRIST$90,000
CHURCH OF CHRIST INDIA MISSION$70,000
PEA RIDGE CHURCH OF CHRIST$18,000
CRESTVIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST$12,500
HOOVER CHURCH OF CHRIST$12,000
ALBERTVILLE CHURCH OF CHRIST$10,000
PLEASANT GROVE CHURCH OF CHRIST$10,000
FOREST PARK CHURCH OF CHRIST$6,000
BUCHANAN CHURCH OF CHRIST$4,000
PINE TREE CHURCH$4,000
CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC$3,000
ROCK VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST$3,000
SOUTHERN HILLS CHURCH OF CHRIST$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PINE TREE CHURCH: $4k → 16%MARION CHURCH OF CHRIST: $90k → 22%PEA RIDGE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $18k → 7%HOOVER CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 16%CRESTVIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST: $55k → 17%CHURCH OF CHRIST INDIA MISSION: $145k → 18%ROCK VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $3k → 19%TARA CHURCH OF CHRIST: $900k → 15%BUCHANAN CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 15%BOULDER COUNTY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $94k → 9%KOSCIUSKO CHURCH OF CHRIST: $3k → 23%MARION CHURCH OF CHRIST: $90k → 22%PEA RIDGE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $18k → 7%HOOVER CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 16%CRESTVIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST: $50k → 17%CHURCH OF CHRIST INDIA MISSION: $89k → 18%ROCK VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $3k → 19%BUCHANAN CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 15%BOULDER COUNTY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $84k → 9%KOSCIUSKO CHURCH OF CHRIST: $3k → 23%MARION CHURCH OF CHRIST: $55k → 22%PEA RIDGE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $18k → 7%HOOVER CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 16%CRESTVIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST: $13k → 17%CHURCH OF CHRIST INDIA MISSION: $70k → 18%ROCK VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $3k → 19%BUCHANAN CHURCH OF CHRIST: $6k → 15%BOULDER COUNTY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $9k → 9%KOSCIUSKO CHURCH OF CHRIST: $3k → 23%PEA RIDGE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $18k → 7%HOOVER CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 16%CRESTVIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST: $13k → 17%ROCK VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $3k → 19%BUCHANAN CHURCH OF CHRIST: $6k → 15%PEA RIDGE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $11k → 7%HOOVER CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 16%CRESTVIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST: $13k → 17%BUCHANAN CHURCH OF CHRIST: $4k → 15%SHANNON CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 7%PLEASANT GROVE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $13k → 16%ALBERTVILLE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $60k → 17%PLEASANT GROVE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $10k → 16%ALBERTVILLE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $15k → 17%PLEASANT GROVE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $10k → 16%ALBERTVILLE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $14k → 17%PLEASANT GROVE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $10k → 16%ALBERTVILLE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $10k → 17%ALBERTVILLE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 17 repeat orgs$922k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$5.0M
$18k

Still filing today

6%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $904k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CROSSVILLE CHURCH OF CHRIST
    4× · 2019–2023 · $3.6M
  • CO
    CHURCH OF CHRIST INDIA MISSION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $306k
  • MC
    MARION CHURCH OF CHRIST
    3× · 2022–2024 · $235k

Funded once

  • SC
    SHANNON CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • WE
    WEST END CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • M
    MISCELLANEOUS
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2019–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2019 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
0/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROSSVILLE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $3,637,568 · OtherCROSSVILLE CHURCH OF CHRISTTARA CHURCH OF CHRIST: $900,000 · OtherTARA CHURCH OF CHRISTCHURCH OF CHRIST INDIA MISSION: $306,000 · OtherMARION CHURCH OF CHRIST: $235,000 · Other+17 more: $793,999 · Other+17 moreCHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Education
Other$5,872,567Education$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization To Preach the Gospel funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from To Preach the Gospel. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY21–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to To Preach the Gospel?

    Find your warmest path to To Preach the Gospel through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on To Preach the Gospel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home