Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Tj Martell Foundation

The t.j.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$4.5M
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$125,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$125,000
CHILDERN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$125,000
MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$125,000
CITY OF HOPE$125,000
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$125,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$125,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$125,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$125,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $125k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $250k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $125k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $125k → 16%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY: $500k → 14%WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE OF EMORY UNIVERSITY: $100k → 13%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $250k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $125k → 17%MD ANERSON CANCER CENTER: $100k → 16%VANDERBILT INGRAM CANCER CENTER: $500k → 14%CHILDERN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $125k → 14%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IRVING MEDICAL CENTER: $300k → 17%MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $100k → 16%VANDERBILT-INGRAM CANCER CENTER: $242k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $125k → 14%COLUMBIA PRESBYTERIAN CANCER CENTER: $300k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $30k → 16%VANDERBILT INGRAM CANCER CENTER: $149k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $100k → 14%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $125k → 17%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $125k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $100k → 14%MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $125k → 17%VANDERBILT-INGRAM CANCER CENTER: $23k → 14%MT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 28% of Tj Martell Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 34% of the giving stays in TN; read by stated purpose it is 11% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Tj Martell Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 23% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 8 repeat orgs$550k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$3.2M
$300k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+82%

Still filing today

63%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Vanderbilt University
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +65%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    3× · 2018–2024 · $625k · revenue +27%
  • VU
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    4× · 2021–2024 · $538k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $125k
  • RW
    Robert W Woodruff Health Sciences Center Fund Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +50%
  • MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue +82%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
2
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Emory University

Emory University's mission is to create, preserve, teach, and apply knowledge in the service of humanity. (See Schedule O for continuation)

Education
5
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
6
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

Umms provides a variety of inpatient/outpatient services to people in the maryland area regardless of their ability to pay. revenues are used to help defray the costs of services.

Health
7
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
8
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
9
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
10
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Vanderbilt University — $1,000,000 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $725,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF …ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $225,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAIRobert W Woodruff Health Sciences Center Fund Inc — $100,000 · EducationChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $625,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los AngelesVanderbilt University Medical Center — $538,295 · HealthVanderbilt University Medical CenterCITY OF HOPE — $325,000 · HealthCITY OF HOPEMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $75,000 · HealthM D ANDERSON PHYSICIANS NETWORK — $200,000 · OtherM D ANDERSON PHYSICIA…UTMD ANDERSON — $155,000 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $125,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFOR…MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $125,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTER…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $125,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVER…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $125,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTER…
Education$2,050,000Health$1,563,295Other$855,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVanderbilt University — $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $725,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $625,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $538,295 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF HOPE — $325,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $225,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tj Martell Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph