Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tiny Blue Dot Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$2.2M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$38MEducation$9.0MScience & Tech$5.3MEnvironment$686kYouth Development$117kCivil Rights$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+12 grants · $5.8M
$252,764
Median grant
9
States reached
$79M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Usona Institute Inc$2,200,000
Allen Institute$526,044
Brown University$437,040
The Regents of the University of California$300,000
Brown University$300,000
University of Oregon$299,996
The Massachusetts General Hospital$299,988
University of Haifa$299,052
University of Wisconsin - Madison$297,165
Florida State University Research Foundation Inc$287,540
Floresta Project Inc$276,602
National Central University$252,764
University of Zurich Psychiatric Hospital$229,810
UC Santa Barbara$225,000
Ernst Strungmann Institut gGmbH$221,718
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Massachusetts General Hospital: $300k → 8%multidisciplinary association for psychedelic stud: $1.1M → 8%University of California Riverside: $150k → 11%INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED CONSCIOUSNESS STUDIES: $820k → 14%UC Santa Barbara: $225k → 14%Floresta Project Inc: $277k → 16%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $345k → 12%Florida State University Research Foundation Inc: $288k → 19%University of Wisconsin - Madison: $570k → 10%University of Oregon: $300k → 15%Brown University: $437k → 14%ALLEN INSTITUTE: $1.2M → 9%MULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOC FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES: $1.1M → 8%INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED CONSCIOUSNESS STUDIES: $648k → 14%FLORESTA PROJECT INC: $227k → 16%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $1.4M → 12%University of Wisconsin - Madison: $297k → 10%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $415k → 14%ALLEN INSTITUTE: $1.1M → 9%MULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOC FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES: $1.1M → 8%INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED CONSCIOUSNESS STUDIES: $641k → 14%FLORESTA PROJECT INC: $183k → 16%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $609k → 12%Brown University: $300k → 14%ALLEN INSTITUTE: $1.0M → 9%INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED CONSCIOUSNESS STUDIES: $540k → 14%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $538k → 12%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $263k → 14%ALLEN INSTITUTE: $997k → 9%BRAINSONIX CORPORATION: $150k → 14%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $187k → 12%Allen Institute: $526k → 9%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CA - LOS ANGELES: $1.0M → 14%USONA INSTITUTE INC: $3.0M → 10%ALLEN INSTITUTE: $250k → 9%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CA - LOS ANGELES: $941k → 14%Usona Institute Inc: $2.6M → 10%ALLEN INSTITUTE: $245k → 9%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CA - LOS ANGELES: $712k → 14%Usona Institute Inc: $2.2M → 10%ALLEN INSTITUTE: $176k → 9%The Regents of the University of California: $300k → 14%USONA INSTITUTE INC: $1.5M → 10%REGENTS OF UCLA: $207k → 14%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CA - LOS ANGELES: $166k → 14%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CA - LOS ANGELES: $160k → 14%UNLIKELY COLLABORATORS FOUNDATION: $25.0M → 14%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CA - LOS ANGELES: $967k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
NY
MA
OR
RI
CA
AZ
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$50M · 17 repeat orgs$27M to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
4

Total granted

$50M
$25M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+354%

Still filing today

47%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthEnvironmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $7.0M · revenue +39%
  • AI
    ALLEN INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.6M · revenue ×15
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED CONSCIOUSNESS STUDIES INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $2.6M · revenue +120% · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • UC
    UNLIKELY COLLABORATORS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25M
  • BC
    BRAINSONIX CORPORATION
    one grant, 2018 · $150k
  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +354%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
5
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
6
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
7
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
8
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
9
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Floresta Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNLIKELY COLLABORATORS FOUNDATION: $25,000,000 · OtherUNLIKELY COLLABORATORS FOUNDATIONMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $7,107,125 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALREGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CA - LOS ANGELES: $4,036,973 · OtherREGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CA - LOS ANGELESUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $3,513,489 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISONMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $3,186,924 · OtherMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA+15 more: $4,934,989 · Other+15 moreUSONA INSTITUTE INC: $9,350,000 · HealthUSONA INSTITUTE INCALLEN INSTITUTE: $5,577,430 · HealthALLEN INSTITUTEMULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES INC: $3,300,000 · HealthMULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION …INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED CONSCIOUSNESS STUDIES INC: $2,648,423 · HealthINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED CONSCIO…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $7,039,214 · EducationUNIVERSITY…FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $287,540 · Education+2 more: $188,000 · EducationBROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,489,860 · Community ImprovementFLORESTA PROJECT INC: $686,457 · EnvironmentHUMAN RIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Civil Rights
Other$47,779,500Health$20,875,853Education$7,514,754Community Improvement$1,489,860Environment$686,457Civil Rights$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUSONA INSTITUTE INC: $9,350,000 over 4y, 28% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $7,039,214 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetALLEN INSTITUTE: $5,577,430 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetMULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES INC: $3,300,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED CONSCIOUSNESS STUDIES INC: $2,648,423 over 4y, 100% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,489,860 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLORESTA PROJECT INC: $686,457 over 3y, 52% of budgetFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $287,540 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $168,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds USONA INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLEN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED CONSCIOUSNESS STUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FLORESTA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tiny Blue Dot Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tiny Blue Dot Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tiny Blue Dot Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Tiny Blue Dot Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tiny Blue Dot’s filings →

    More from the funding graph