Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

California · Private foundation

Timothy & Karen Chrisman Foundation

$13k
Granted FY2017
4
Grants FY2017
4
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2017
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2017
$10,111
States reached, FY2017
1

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Cambria Education Foundation$1,00013%

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($12k), not named here.

Compare Timothy & Karen Chrisman Foundation with peer funders

About Timothy & Karen Chrisman Foundation

How much does Timothy & Karen Chrisman Foundation give?
Timothy & Karen Chrisman Foundation reported 4 grants totaling $13,111 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does Timothy & Karen Chrisman Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Membership Benefit (77%), Education (8%), Youth Development (8%).
Who are Timothy & Karen Chrisman Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: Cambria Education Foundation ($1k).
Where is Timothy & Karen Chrisman Foundation based?
Timothy & Karen Chrisman Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2020) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Timothy & Karen Chrisman’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home