Skip to content
Tibor & Sheila Hollo Charitable Fou at a glance

· Private foundation

Tibor & Sheila Hollo Charitable Fou

$1.3M
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Philanthropy$1.3MEducation$61kHousing & Shelter$17kHuman Services$5kCivil Rights$5kHealth$1kInternational$1kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$53
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIU Foundation Inc$1,100,000
Greater Miami Jewish Federation$200,000
Camillus House Inc$6,000
Univ of Miami for Miller School Med$1,000
Covenant House$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Les Ailes Du Desir Foundation: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago

Juf provides critical resources that bring food, refuge, health care, education and emergency assistance to over 500,000 chicagoans of all faiths and millions of jews in israel and around the world, funding a network of 100+ agencies,…

Philanthropy
3
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
6
Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia

The jewish federation of greater philadelphia mobilizes financial and volunteer resources to create a bright future for jewish people everywhere. the jewish federation cares for those in need, combats antisemitism and global crises, and…

Philanthropy
7
University of Judaism Foundation
—
8
International Fellowship of Christians & Jews Inc

The international fellowship of christian and jews is the leading non-profit building bridges between christians and jews, blessing israel and the jewish people around the world with, humanitarian care and life-saving aid.

—
9
Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc

The jewish federation of greater atlanta cares for, connects and strengthens our jewish community throughout greater atlanta, israel and the world.

Philanthropy
10
Ccf New York Jewish French Community Center of Ny Inc

To further French Jewish Culture, help integration of American in France and French in USA concerning Jewish Culture

Religion
11
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
12
The Jerusalem Connection
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Federation of Jewish Communities of the Cis Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bascom Palmer Eye Institute Alumni Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIU Foundation Inc: $1,100,000 · OtherFIU Foundation IncFL Intl University Foundation Inc: $50,000 · Other+5 more: $34,036 · OtherGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $200,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JE…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,000 · Civil RightsLes Ailes Du Desir Foundation Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $50 · Human ServicesALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $100 · HealthSHABBOT SHALOM FAX OF LIFE INC: $18 · International
Other$1,184,036Philanthropy$201,000Civil Rights$5,000Human Services$1,050Health$100International$18

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMILLUS HOUSE INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBascom Palmer Eye Institute Alumni Association Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLes Ailes Du Desir Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHABBOT SHALOM FAX OF LIFE INC: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tibor & Sheila Hollo Charitable Fou funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tibor & Sheila Hollo Charitable Fou. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Camillus House Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tibor & Sheila Hollo Charitable Fou’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home