Skip to content
Tht Hesed Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Tht Hesed Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$29k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Religion$1.0MHuman Services$480kHealth$76kEducation$48kFood & Nutrition$43kInternational$17kArts & Culture$16kPhilanthropy$14kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$28,737
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$28,737
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NISSIM VENIFLAOT: $600 → 11%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $750 → 20%THE NEST FUND: $3k → 20%THE NEST FUND: $1k → 20%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND: $4k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
NV
NJ
CT
CA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$514k · 32 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 32 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
151

Total granted

$514k
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+53%

Still filing today

38%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22
ReligionEducationPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $26k · revenue +71%
  • SF
    SAFE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $15k · revenue +11%
  • KY
    KEREN YOM TOV INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • CA
    Community Assistance Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $267k
  • MD
    MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH
    one grant, 2019 · $171k
  • CM
    CONGREGATION MAGEN DAVID OF MANHATTAN
    one grant, 2018 · $140k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
4
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
5
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
6
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
7
Zichroin Rabbeini Meshilem Feiish Ztl Foundation
—
8
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
9
Sherit Isroel
—
10
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Rashbi Tehillim Incorporated
Religion
12
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Shaare Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Ora. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 184 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/48
Grantees still filing
33/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Community Assistance Fund: $266,600 · OtherCommunity Assistance FundIndividual grant recipient: $187,056 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH: $171,374 · OtherMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAHIndividual grant recipient: $71,100 · OtherMAGEN DAVID SYNAGOGUE: $58,579 · Other+139 more: $807,407 · Other+139 moreCONGREGATION MAGEN DAVID OF MANHATTAN: $140,395 · ReligionCONGREGATI…KEREN YOM TOV INC: $10,100 · ReligionKEREN YOM …+13 more: $26,814 · Religion+13 moreTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $25,501 · Food & NutritionSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $1,800 · Food & NutritionTAMAR FUND INTERNATIONAL INC: $9,800 · HealthBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $9,800 · HealthNew York Cancer Center Inc: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthAmerican Friends of EshelInc: $5,901 · EducationMABAS FUND INC: $5,200 · EducationYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $4,600 · EducationTORAT MOSHE MALKA INC: $1,800 · EducationMATTEH MOSHE INC: $800 · Education+3 more: $1,400 · EducationTHE MATAN BASESER FOUNDATION CO MOSHE KESTENBAUM: $2,600 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF PEER HASHALOM: $2,600 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MISHKAN SHAUL INC: $2,001 · PhilanthropyOR LEZION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyYAD CHAZAKA CORP: $2,000 · PhilanthropyKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $1,800 · PhilanthropyMAGEN AVRAHAM FUND: $1,100 · PhilanthropyTHE NEST FUND INC: $3,800 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND INC: $3,600 · Human ServicesMITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $750 · Human ServicesNISSIM VENIFLAOT: $600 · Human Services
Other$1,562,116Religion$177,309Food & Nutrition$27,301Health$21,100Education$19,701Philanthropy$14,101Human Services$8,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONGREGATION MAGEN DAVID OF MANHATTAN: $140,395 over 1y, 20% of budgetEZRA CORNMAN BAR MITZVAH FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $25,501 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $15,352 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTAMAR FUND INTERNATIONAL INC: $9,800 over 2y, 12% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $9,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of EshelInc: $5,901 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Friends of Mikdash Shaul I: $5,901 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMABAS FUND INC: $5,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLEV MODIIN: $4,700 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $4,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $4,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEST FUND INC: $3,800 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORA: $3,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSEPHARDIC INSTITUTE SEPHARDIC INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEARNING: $2,911 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $2,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTIFERET TORAH INC: $2,001 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MISHKAN SHAUL INC: $2,001 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetOR LEZION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetYAD CHAZAKA CORP: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCARMEI HA'IR INTERNATIONAL: $1,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTORAT MOSHE MALKA INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAGEN AVRAHAM FUND: $1,100 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA BIRKAT ISRAEL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMATTEH MOSHE INC: $800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNISSIM VENIFLAOT: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZERA SHIMSHON: $600 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHILD LIFE SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOhalei Yosef Yitzchak INC: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSEPHARDIC BROOKLYN COMMUNITY ERUB LTD: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL OHR HATALMUD INC: $201 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNACHLAT MEIR INSTITUTIONS INC DBA NETIVEY HATORA INSTITUTIONS: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONGREGATION MAGEN DAVID OF MANHATTAN ↗
  • Who funds EZRA CORNMAN BAR MITZVAH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN YOM TOV INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH PUBLICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds TAMAR FUND INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Jimmy and Berta K…The Howard Hoffman & …Ralph J Harary Founda…The Setton FoundationThe Ralph S Gindi Fam…Cabasso Family Founda…The Amin and Lillian …Chehebar Family Found…Jewish Communal FundMarbeh Shalom Foundat…Isaac & Marjorie Gind…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY71.2× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tht Hesed Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tht Hesed Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    8get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tht Hesed Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Tht Hesed Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 184 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports $782k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tht Hesed’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home