Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Ohio · Public charity

Three Valley Conservation Trust

THREE VALLEY CONSERVATION TRUST partners with people and communities to conserve the natural environment and cultural heritage of our service area for the well-being of future generations

$272k
Granted FY2019
2
Grants FY2019
1
Organizations funded FY2019
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

56% of Three Valley Conservation Trust’s FY2019 grant dollars went to Middletown Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Median grant, FY2019
$150,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$150,000
States reached, FY2019
1
Total assets, FY2019
$5.8M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Butler County Board of Elections$117,0001n/a

Compare Three Valley Conservation Trust with peer funders

About Three Valley Conservation Trust

How much does Three Valley Conservation Trust give?
Three Valley Conservation Trust reported 2 grants totaling $272,000 in its FY2019 IRS filing.
What does Three Valley Conservation Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2019, its largest causes are Philanthropy (56%), Recreation & Sports (44%).
Who are Three Valley Conservation Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2019: Butler County Board of Elections ($117k).
Where is Three Valley Conservation Trust based?
Three Valley Conservation Trust is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Three Valley Conservation’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home