Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thomas H & Laverne Caldwell Charitable Found

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Health$71kAnimals$67kEducation$67kReligion$33kHousing & Shelter$33k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,188
Median grant
4
States reached
$579k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS$8,750
HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY TX$4,375
SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$4,375
WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC$4,375
NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE$2,188
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$2,188
INTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF$2,188
BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FDN$2,188
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS$2,188
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CTR$2,188
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $2k → 6%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CTR: $2k → 17%BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FDN: $2k → 14%WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $5k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES: $2k → 14%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $9k → 14%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $2k → 6%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CTR: $2k → 17%BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FDN: $2k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY TX: $5k → 16%HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS: $2k → 14%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $9k → 14%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $2k → 6%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CTR: $2k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY TX: $4k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES: $2k → 14%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $9k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY TX: $4k → 16%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $9k → 14%SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 14%WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $4k → 16%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $8k → 14%SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 14%WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $4k → 16%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $8k → 14%SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY TX: $4k → 16%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $8k → 14%SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 14%WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $4k → 16%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $8k → 14%SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 14%WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $4k → 16%BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FDN: $6k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY TX: $4k → 16%SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 14%WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $4k → 16%BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FDN: $2k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY TX: $4k → 16%SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 14%WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $4k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY TX: $4k → 16%SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY TX: $4k → 16%WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $4k → 16%INTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF: $2k → 16%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 16%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$272k · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$272k
$0

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $67k · revenue +45%
  • WF
    WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $33k · revenue +237%
  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
    8× · 2018–2025 · $33k · revenue +20%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Scott & White Clinic

    Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

    Health
    2
    Baylor Research Institute

    To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

    Health
    3
    Baylor All Saints Medical Center

    Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

    Health
    4
    Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie

    Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

    Health
    5
    Baylor University Medical Center

    Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

    Health
    6
    Scott & White Hospital-College Station

    Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

    Health
    7
    Scott & White Memorial Hospital

    Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

    Health
    8
    Animal Wellness Action

    To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

    Human Services
    9
    Humane Farm Animal Care

    Every farmer and rancher participating in the Certified Humane program had to modify their operations to meet the Animal Care Standards and be certified. Schedule O

    Animals
    10
    Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers- Capitol Area

    Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

    Health
    11
    Saint Francis Hospital Inc

    To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

    Health
    12
    Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

    Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

    Health

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Children and the most unlike its peers is College of the Ozarks. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    7/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $33,438 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL …Baylor Health Care System Foundation — $21,154 · HealthBaylor Health Care System Fou…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $16,720 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANC…COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS — $66,875 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKSHUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY TX — $25,063 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHIT…FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH — $16,720 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHINTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF — $16,720 · OtherINTERFAITH MINISTRIES OFHumane World for Animals Inc — $16,720 · AnimalsHumane World for …NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $16,720 · AnimalsNORTH SHORE ANIMA…HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY — $8,375 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF…WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC — $33,438 · ReligionWICHITA FALLS…
    Health$71,312Education$66,875Other$58,503Animals$41,815Religion$33,438

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS — $66,875 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC — $33,438 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $33,438 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation — $21,154 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $16,720 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $16,720 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $16,720 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY — $8,375 over 2y, 1.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS
    • Who funds WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC
    • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
    • Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation
    • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc
    • Who funds NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC
    • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Thomas H & Laverne Caldwell Charitable Found funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph