Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas & Margaret Tan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$154kHealth$77kEnvironment$6kHuman Services$4k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$734k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$20,000
COLGATE UNIVERSITY$13,000
UCSF CAROL FRANK BUCK BREAST CARE C$5,000
Bellarmine College Preparatory$3,000
TUESDAY'S CHILDREN$2,000
ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION$1,200
OUR LADY OF MERCY COMMUNITY OUTREAC$1,000
ADDICTION ED SOCIETY$1,000
LOW COUNTRY LAND TRUST$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 49% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%HILLSBOROUGH BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDAT: $1k → 7%Bellarmine College Preparatory: $4k → 8%CAROL FRANK BUCK BREAST CANCER: $4k → 10%ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%TUESDAY'S CHILDREN: $2k → 6%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTRING CANCER CENT: $3k → 17%LOW COUNTRY LAND TRUST: $1k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%HILLSBOROUGH BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDAT: $1k → 7%Bellarmine College Preparatory: $3k → 8%CAROL FRANK BUCK BREAST CANCER: $3k → 10%ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%TUESDAY'S CHILDREN: $1k → 6%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATI: $1k → 17%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%HILLSBOROUGH BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDAT: $1k → 7%Bellarmine College Preparatory: $3k → 8%TUESDAY'S CHILDREN: $180 → 6%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $13k → 11%HILLSBOROUGH BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDAT: $1k → 7%Bellarmine College Preparatory: $3k → 8%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%HILLSBOROUGH BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDAT: $1k → 7%Bellarmine College Preparatory: $2k → 8%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%ADDICTION ED SOCIETY: $5k → 7%Bellarmine College Preparatory: $1k → 8%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 11%ADDICTION ED SOCIETY: $1k → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%ADDICTION ED SOCIETY: $1k → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $13k → 8%ADDICTION ED SOCIETY: $878 → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $12k → 8%ADDICTION ED SOCIETY: $520 → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $12k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $4k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$167k · 10 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -81% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$167k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-81%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentSocial SciencePhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    COLGATE UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $72k · revenue +60%
  • HB
    HILLSBOROUGH BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +75%
  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTRING CANCER CENT
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -81%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
3
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
9
Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health

The lucile packard foundation for children's health is here to unlock philanthropy to transform health for all kids and moms, in northern california and around the world. our foundation raises funds for child and maternal health at lucile…

Health
10
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Baldrick's Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsborough Beautification Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $72,000 · EducationCOLGATE UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $63,750 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY+1 more: $3,000 · EducationUCSF BENIOFF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $24,500 · OtherUCSF BENIOFF CHILDREN'S HOSPITALUCSF CAROL FRANC BUCK BREAST CARE C: $24,000 · OtherUCSF CAROL FRANC BUCK BREAST CARE CBELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPARATORY: $15,000 · OtherBELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPARATORYADDICTION ED SOCIETY: $8,398 · OtherADDICTION ED SOCIETYCAROL FRANK BUCK BREAST CANCER: $7,250 · OtherCAROL FRANK BUCK BREAST CANCERUCSF CAROL FRANK BUCK BREAST CARE C: $5,000 · OtherUCSF CAROL FRANK BUCK BREAST CARE C+2 more: $3,500 · OtherHILLSBOROUGH BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EnvironmentLOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $4,200 · PhilanthropyTUESDAY'S CHILDREN: $3,180 · Public Safety & DisasterALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Social Science
Education$138,750Other$87,648Environment$6,000Philanthropy$4,200Public Safety & Disaster$3,180Social Science$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $72,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $63,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSBOROUGH BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $4,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTUESDAY'S CHILDREN: $3,180 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HILLSBOROUGH BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TUESDAY'S CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas & Margaret Tan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas & Margaret Tan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thomas & Margaret Tan Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Thomas & Margaret Tan Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas & Margaret Tan Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph