Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thieme Family Foundation Tr Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$153kHealth$114kHuman Services$33kRecreation & Sports$30kHousing & Shelter$13kPhilanthropy$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$906k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORT WAYNE SEXUAL ASSAULT TREATMENT$7,500
BREASTIE BOXES INC$7,500
REDEMPTION HOUSE MINISTRIES$7,500
STAR 883$7,500
FW 22$5,000
CAMP WATCHA WANNA DO LTD$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FORT WAYNE TRAILS INC$5,000
REMEMBERING ROWAN JOY INC$2,500
KATE'S KART$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%A HOPE CENTER: $3k → 12%BREASTIE BOXES INC: $13k → 12%BREASTIE BOXES INC: $8k → 12%BREASTIE BOXES INC: $8k → 12%KATE'S KART: $3k → 12%KATE'S KART: $3k → 12%KATE'S KART: $3k → 12%KATE'S KART: $3k → 12%KATE'S KART: $3k → 12%KATE'S KART: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$407k · 14 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$407k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+21%

Still filing today

71%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FN
    FORENSIC NURSING SPECIALTIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $54k · revenue +135%
  • SE
    STAR EDUCATIONAL MEDIA NETWORK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $53k · revenue +28%
  • RH
    Redemption House Ministry Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $53k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • NI
    NORTHEAST INDIANA CHRISTIAN ACTION COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE FU
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worthy Women Recovery Home Inc

To reduce recidivism rate in female offenders in laporte county.

Health
2
First Choice Center for Women Inc

Constructive alternatives to abortion and assisting women in crisis pregnancies. The mission of First Choice Center for Women, Inc. is to see the Word of God birthed in the hearts of men and women and to make abortion unnecessary and…

Religion
3
Crossroads for Her Ministry Inc

A non-denominational local christian ministry focused on providing christ-centered physical, mental and spiritual comfort to women in need. our mission is to present christ's love through the gospel as we endeavor to enrich the lives of…

Religion
4
Turning Point Inc

Our mission is to provide professional counseling with the highest level of ethical standards to individuals in the community . We believe in health, healing, hope, growth, recovery and transformation as foundational goals for everyone and…

Health
5
Hope Gathering Inc

We are a community of widows finding hope and healing in Christ, encouraging one another in the journey and seeking Gods purpose for our lives in this season.

Community Improvement
6
His House for Her Inc

We believe women deserve a chance to triumph over trauma and a place to become whole.

Housing & Shelter
7
Palouse Care Network Inc

We are a Christian Organization that provides confidential and compassionate care in the form of specialized medical, practical and spiritual support to those facing pregnancy, parenting, sexuality and abortion related issues.

Health
8
Hope for Women Llc

Hope For Women, LLC, will operate a Christian based, charitable treatment center for recovering female addicts in Walker County, Alabama that provides a place for shelter and recovery to women suffering from alcohol and drug addiction and…

Human Services
9
A Better Choice Women's Center Inc

Abc women's center is a christ centered ministry offering hope, help and healing to men and women facing an unplanned pregnancy by providing a full- range of life affirming options and support. the center offers free and confidential…

—
10
Care Net Pregnancy Resources of Warren County Inc

Care Net Pregnancy Resources of Warren County offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them realistic alternatives and Christ-centered support through our life-affirming programs.

Health
11
First Choice for Women Inc

First choice for women exists to share the grace and truth of jesus christ and uphold the sanctity of human life while serving those facing unplanned pregnancies, promoting premarital sexual abstinence, and caring for those hurt by…

Health
12
Scarlet Hope Nashville

To share the hope and love of Jesus with women in the adult entertainment industry

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeast Indiana Christian Action Council Educational & Charitable Fu; the most unlike its peers is Cross Connections Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientK21 HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherK21 HEALTH FOUNDATIONWORSHIP FOR SHUT-INS: $17,500 · OtherWORSHIP FOR SHUT-INSIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFW 22: $5,000 · OtherRedemption House Ministry Inc: $52,500 · ReligionRedemption House Minis…CAMP WATCHA WANNA DO LTD: $30,000 · ReligionCAMP WATCHA WANNA DO L…FORENSIC NURSING SPECIALTIES INC: $54,000 · HealthFORENSIC NURSING SP…Cross Connections Inc: $17,939 · HealthCross Connections I…STAR EDUCATIONAL MEDIA NETWORK INC: $52,500 · Arts & CultureSTAR EDUCATION…Breastie Boxes Inc: $27,500 · Human ServicesBreastie Box…KATE'S KART INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesKATE'S KART …NORTHEAST INDIANA CHRISTIAN ACTION COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE FU: $2,500 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST IN…FORT WAYNE TRAILS INC: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsREMEMBERING ROWAN JOY INC: $12,500 · PhilanthropyFORT WAYNE RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $12,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$107,500Religion$82,500Health$71,939Arts & Culture$52,500Human Services$45,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Philanthropy$12,500Housing & Shelter$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFORENSIC NURSING SPECIALTIES INC: $54,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetSTAR EDUCATIONAL MEDIA NETWORK INC: $52,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetRedemption House Ministry Inc: $52,500 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCAMP WATCHA WANNA DO LTD: $30,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetFORT WAYNE TRAILS INC: $30,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetBreastie Boxes Inc: $27,500 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetCross Connections Inc: $17,939 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetKATE'S KART INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetREMEMBERING ROWAN JOY INC: $12,500 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetFORT WAYNE RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST INDIANA CHRISTIAN ACTION COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE FU: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FORENSIC NURSING SPECIALTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds STAR EDUCATIONAL MEDIA NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Redemption House Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAMP WATCHA WANNA DO LTD ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE TRAILS INC ↗
  • Who funds Breastie Boxes Inc ↗
  • Who funds Cross Connections Inc ↗
  • Who funds KATE'S KART INC ↗
  • Who funds REMEMBERING ROWAN JOY INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST INDIANA CHRISTIAN ACTION COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE FU ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne IncIN17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Brotherhood Mutual Foundation Inc · Parkview Health System Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Demarchis Family Foundation · Tim and Libby Ash Family Foundation Inc · Edward D & Ione Auer Foundation Monarch Capital David Meyer Trustee · M E Raker Foundation Inc · Do It Best Foundation Inc · Edward M Wilson Foundation · Mary Cross Tippmann Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thieme Family Foundation Tr Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thieme Family Foundation Tr Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thieme Family Foundation Tr Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph