· Private foundation
Thibault Foundation a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
100% of Thibault Foundation a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Thibault Foundation a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $40k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2017
- Under $10k7 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE AT STANFORD | $10,000 |
| BENEDICTINE FATHERS OF THE PRIORY SCHOOL | $7,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $5,000 |
| LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER BAY AREA | $5,000 |
| M-A HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION FOR THE FUTURE | $4,000 |
| RPM FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $1,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES - BAY AREA ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER BAY AREA ↗
- Who funds RPM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Thibault Foundation a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thibault Foundation a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Thibault Foundation a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation?
Find your warmest path to Thibault Foundation a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Thibault Foundation a California Nonprofit Public Benefit’s filings →