· Public charity
The Youngstown Edison Business Incubator
Business development: to cultivate, accelerate and prmote the formation, growth, commercialization and innovation of technology-based businesses by providing the comprehensive, high quality entrepreneurial services and resoruces in a robust environment that promotes company success, attraction and retention to cultivate, accelerate and…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 21 grants below total $453,300 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $613,545 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $160,245 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $149k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $246k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DEFENSE & ENERGY SYSTEMS LLC | $181,335 |
| BRITE ENERGY INNOVATORS | $64,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $34,983 |
| Individual grant recipient | $17,510 |
| XALOY | $12,500 |
| WATERLOX COATINGS CORPORATION | $12,500 |
| MAGNETIC ANALYSIS CORPORATION | $12,500 |
| KIRALY TOOL AND DIE INC | $12,500 |
| ALLOY PRECISION TECHNOLOGIES INC | $12,500 |
| MARADYNE CORPORATION | $12,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $11,850 |
| MAGNET | $10,000 |
| TEAMNEO FOUNDATION | $9,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $148k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BEBRITE ENERGY INNOVATORS3× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +78%
- AFAMERICAN FOUNDRY SOCIETY2× · 2017–2018 · $131k · revenue +48%
- TNTeam NEO Foundation6× · 2017–2024 · $97k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- BBRITEone grant, 2023 · $75k
- J3JUBBERBOT 3Done grant, 2019 · $64k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $58k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Leading source of knowledge and thought leadership for creating a more sustainable, safe, secure, and technically advanced built environment.
To aid and promote, by financial assistance and otherwise, educational, research, and extension in the college of engineering at north carolina state university
Trade association for the industrial supply industry.
To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.
To enhance both the global competitiveness of u.s. business and the u.s. quality of life by promoting and facilitating voluntary consensus standards and conformity assessment systems, and safeguarding their integrity.
Manage and provide oversight and support of the national center for defense manufacturing and machining and the advanced manufacturing international, inc.
Association of trust and estate lawyers meeting the highest professional standards.
The edison electric institute (eei) is the association that represents all u.s. investor-owned electric companies. our members provide electricity for more than 250 million americans, and operate in all 50 states and the district of…
Support professionalism, ethics, education, and research in the building enclosure industry.
The University of Illinois Foundation's corporate mission is to advance the interests and welfare of the University of Illinois. As stated in its Articles of Incorporation, the role of the Foundation is procuring private support on behalf…
Advancing our customers' manufacturing competitiveness through innovation in joining and allied technologies
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advanced Methods in Innovation and the most unlike its peers is Brite Energy Innovators. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Youngstown Edison Business Incubator funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.