Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Kansas · Public charity

The Young Men's Christian Association of Wichita Kansas (2311)

Our mission is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that promote healthy lifestyles, strong families and positive youth development to build healthy spirit, mind and body for all, regardless of ability to pay.

$25k
Granted FY2018
1
Itemized grants FY2018
1
Organizations funded FY2018
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2018
$7k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2018
$6,500
Largest grant, FY2018
$6,500
States reached, FY2018
1
Total assets, FY2018
$237M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2018, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Kansas Grown Inc$6,5001n/a

Compare The Young Men's Christian Association of Wichita Kansas (2311) with peer funders

About The Young Men's Christian Association of Wichita Kansas (2311)

How much does The Young Men's Christian Association of Wichita Kansas (2311) give?
The Young Men's Christian Association of Wichita Kansas (2311) reported 1 itemized grants totaling $6,500, out of $25,100 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2018 IRS filing.
What does The Young Men's Christian Association of Wichita Kansas (2311) fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2018, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (100%).
Who are The Young Men's Christian Association of Wichita Kansas (2311)'s largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2018: Kansas Grown Inc ($7k).
Where is The Young Men's Christian Association of Wichita Kansas (2311) based?
The Young Men's Christian Association of Wichita Kansas (2311) is based in KS.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $3k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2018, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Young Men's Christian Association of Wichita Kansas (2311)’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home