Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Young Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$103k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$466kPublic Safety & Disaster$74kHealth$44kArts & Culture$35kYouth Development$17kHuman Services$17kReligion$14kAnimals$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EL CAMPO MIDDLE SCHOOL BAND$8,762
GANADO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$5,000
MARKHAM VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$5,000
GANADO HIGH SCHOOL ONE ACT PLAY$4,300
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
EL CAMPO METHODIST CHILD CARE SERVI$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Jackson County Hospital EMS: $10k → 15%El Campo Medical Foundation: $10k → 15%LAVACA-NAVIDAD RIVER AUTHORITY: $6k → 15%El Campo Medical Foundation: $10k → 15%El Campo Medical Foundation: $10k → 15%GANADO HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOOSTERS: $5k → 15%El Campo Medical Foundation: $10k → 15%GANADO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 15%EL CAMPO MIDDLE SCHOOL BAND: $9k → 15%GANADO HIGH SCHOOL ONE ACT PLAY: $5k → 15%CITY OF EL CAMPO EMS: $5k → 15%Ganado Education Foundation: $5k → 15%MARKHAM VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 20%MACY MAREK: $4k → 15%GANADO HIGH SCHOOL BAND: $5k → 15%MARKHAM VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 20%MACY MAREK: $4k → 15%GANADO HIGH SCHOOL ONE ACT PLAY: $4k → 15%MARKHAM VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 20%MACY MAREK: $4k → 15%Ganado Volunteer Fire Department: $3k → 15%MARKHAM VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 20%EL CAMPO HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 15%GANADO ISD: $3k → 15%SERVE OUTDOORS: $3k → 20%EL CAMPO METHODIST CHILD CARE SERVI: $4k → 15%PROSPERITY BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 15%Markham Volunteer Fire Departemnt: $3k → 20%El Campo Medical Foundation: $4k → 15%GANADO BAND BOOSTER CLUB: $2k → 15%MARKHAM VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 20%First United Methodist Child Care: $3k → 15%MARKHAM METHODIST CHURCH: $2k → 20%Boy Scouts of America Cub Scout Pac: $3k → 15%I AM CHOSEN MINISTRIES: $2k → 20%CITY OF EL CAMPO EMS: $3k → 15%Boys Girls Club of El Campo: $3k → 15%Matagorda CountY WOMEN'S CRISIS CEN: $5k → 20%El Campo Museum of Natural History: $3k → 15%ST PHILIP THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC SCHO: $3k → 15%PILGRIM REST BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 15%El Campo Volunteer Fire Department: $3k → 15%CITY OF EL CAMPO EMS: $2k → 15%NORTHSIDE CENTER: $2k → 15%LOUISE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%LOUISE BEAUTIFICATION INC: $5k → 15%LOUISE BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE: $3k → 15%Louise Volunteer Fire Department: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of The Young Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Young Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$512k · 56 repeat orgs$174k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

56 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
62

Total granted

$512k
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+4%

Still filing today

4%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EL CAMPO MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $44k · revenue -5%
  • MV
    MARKHAM VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $27k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2021–2025 · $16k

Funded once

  • JC
    Jackson County Hospital EMS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • LR
    LAVACA-NAVIDAD RIVER AUTHORITY
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • GE
    Ganado Education Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Bench Volunteer Fire Dept

Rural volunteer fire protection to members.

—
2
Hankamer Volunteer Fire Department

Provide fire fighting & ambulance service to hankamer, texas and surrounding areas.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Waskom Volunteer Fire Department & Ems Services Inc

Firefighter & emergency medical services for the waskom, tx area.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Westside Volunteer Fire Department

Fire protection

—
5
New Bethel Volunteer Fire Dept

Volunteer fire department serving the residents of new bethel community in alabama

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Ellinger Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer fire department

—
7
Rudolph Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Provide fire fighting services

—
8
Northwest Volunteer Fire Department

Fire prevention and suppression

—
9
Weston Volunteer Fire Dept Inc

Provide fire protection for local community

—
10
North Hood County Volunteer Fire Department-First Responders

To provide citizens timely response to fire and medical emergencies.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Santo Volunteer Fire and Ems Dept

Provision of fire and emergency medical services to santo and the surrounding communities

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Winchell Volunteer Fire Department

To protect & preserve life & property

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Campo Medical Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Boarding for Rescues & Animal Welfare. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EL CAMPO MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $43,700 · OtherEL CAMPO MEDICAL FOUNDATIONMARKHAM VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $26,700 · Other+126 more: $603,139 · Other+126 moreFoundation For Rural Service: $6,000 · EducationEL CAMPO MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureNORTHSIDE CENTER INC: $2,000 · HealthBOARDING FOR RESCUES & ANIMAL WELFARE: $2,000 · Animals
Other$673,539Education$6,000Arts & Culture$2,500Health$2,000Animals$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEL CAMPO MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $43,700 over 5y, 11% of budgetFoundation For Rural Service: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEL CAMPO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5,700 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetEL CAMPO MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetNORTHSIDE CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOARDING FOR RESCUES & ANIMAL WELFARE: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EL CAMPO MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Young Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Young Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Young Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Young Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 132 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Young Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph