Skip to content
The Winthrop Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Winthrop Foundation

THE WINTHROP FOUNDATION is a volunteer board of trustees whose mission is to offer grant funding to a range of programs and organizations in winthrop to improve the quality of life of our community.

$202k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$131k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$136kPublic Benefit$131kPublic Safety & Disaster$70kPhilanthropy$34kHuman Services$15kCommunity Improvement$14kEducation$6k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $190,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $201,849 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,249 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $54k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $131k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$701k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOWN OF WINTHROP$131,100
11 FOUNDATION - IN MEMORY OF MICHAEL MASON INC$25,000
FOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL$15,000
WINTHROP CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$13,500
NORTHEAST METROPOLITAN REGIONAL VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$329k · 4 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$329k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+88%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WINTHROP PUBLIC HEALTH & CLINICAL SERVICES
    4× · 2020–2025 · $201k
  • WP
    WINTHROP PARKS AND RECREATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $67k
  • T1
    THE 11 FOUNDATION - IN MEMORY OF MICHAEL MASON INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $34k · revenue -3%

Funded once

  • WL
    WINTHROP LITTLE LEAGUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +88%
  • WY
    WINTHROP YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +32%
  • WY
    WINTHROP YOUTH CHEER
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WINTHROP PUBLIC HEALTH & CLINICAL SERVICES: $201,056 · OtherWINTHROP PUBLIC HEALTH & CLINICAL SERVICESWINTHROP PARKS AND RECREATION: $66,500 · OtherWINTHROP PARKS AND RECREATIONWINTHROP CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $27,000 · OtherWINTHROP CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INCWINTHROP YOUTH CHEER: $12,665 · Other+2 more: $16,000 · OtherTHE 11 FOUNDATION - IN MEMORY OF MICHAEL MASON INC: $34,350 · PhilanthropyTHE 11 FO…WINTHROP LITTLE LEAGUE INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsWINTHROP …WINTHROP YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $13,240 · Recreation & SportsWINTHROP …FOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL INC: $15,000 · Human Services
Other$323,221Philanthropy$34,350Recreation & Sports$33,240Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWINTHROP LITTLE LEAGUE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetFOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINTHROP YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $13,240 over 1y, 5.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Winthrop Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Winthrop Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • For Kids Only Afterschool Inc: 27% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Winthrop Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Winthrop Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Winthrop’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home