Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Winmax Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$284k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.1MArts & Culture$523kCommunity Improvement$331kEducation$322kEnvironment$104kInternational$104kHealth$97kPhilanthropy$78kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $184k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$501k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Vail Valley Foundation$85,000
Bravo Colorado at Vail-Beaver Creek dba Bravo Vail Music Festival$45,000
Education Foundation of Eagle County$25,000
Round-Up River Ranch$25,000
Betty Ford Alpine Gardens$20,000
Vail Christian Academy$15,000
Eagle Valley Community Foundation$12,000
Guardian Scholars$12,000
Colorado Mountain College Fund$10,000
Vail Performning Arts Academy$10,000
Bright Futures Foundation$10,000
Vail Health Foundation$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Vail Jazz Foundation$1,000
Tubac Center for the Arts$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Woman's Foundation of Colorado: $5k → 12%Women's Foundation of Colorado: $2k → 12%Women's Foundation of Colorado: $2k → 12%Vail Veterans Program: $3k → 7%Vail Veterans Program: $2k → 7%Vail Veterans Program: $1k → 7%Vail Veterans Program: $1k → 7%Vail Veterans Program: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 30 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
22

Total granted

$2.3M
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+9%

Still filing today

70%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    Betty Ford Alpine Gardens
    9× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +97%
  • BC
    BRAVO COLORADO AT BEAVER CREEK-VAIL INC DBA BRAVO VAIL VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $95k · revenue +9%
  • EF
    EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF EAGLE CNTY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $70k · revenue +843%

Funded once

  • BC
    Bravo CO Music Festival Fdn
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • CS
    Colorado Snowsports Museum
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vail International Pro Am
Recreation & Sports
2
Vail-Summit Research & Education Foundat
Education
3
Vail Health Services

Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.

Health
4
Eagle River Valley Childcare

Eagle river valley childcare is strategically designed to address the childcare supply and affordability issues in the eagle county, colorado community.

Human Services
5
Vvmc Diversified Services

Elevating health across our mountain communities.

Health
6
Fountain Valley School of Colorado

Fountain valley school of colorado provides a transformative curriculum in a supportive environment where students are challenged to think critically, become leaders, and live by our core values: courage, compassion, curiosity,…

Education
7
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
8
Aspen Valley Land Trust

Protecting the open land and special places of the roaring fork and middle colorado river valleys for wildlife, agriculture, and community forever.

Environment
9
Vermont Public Co

Vermont public informs, educates, and entertains through public service journalism and enlightening content rooted in vermont. our storytelling enriches lives and fosters community connection and understanding.

Arts & Culture
10
Vail Valley Partnership

Our mission is focused around five primary goals: building communities to which residents, visitors and investors are attracted; promoting the communities; striving to ensure future prosperity via a pro-business climate; representing the…

—
11
Aspen Center for Environmental Studies

Aces' mission is to inspire a life-long commitment to the earth by providing innovative and immersive programming for all ages.

Environment
12
Vermont Electric Cooperative Inc

Vermont electric cooperative is a member owned not-for-profit whose mission is to provide safe, affordable, and reliable energy services to its members.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Maysville Players Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
21/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Bright Futures for Eagle County: $1,086,300 · OtherBright Futures for Eagle CountyBravo Colorado Music Festival: $182,000 · OtherBravo Colorado Music FestivalColorado Mountain College Fund: $134,200 · OtherColorado Mountain College FundBRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATION: $100,800 · OtherBRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATIONArt in Public Places: $67,000 · Other+29 more: $224,500 · Other+29 moreVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $330,250 · Community ImprovementVAIL VALLEY F…+1 more: $1,000 · Community ImprovementVAIL PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY: $97,400 · Arts & CultureVAIL PERFO…BRAVO COLORADO AT BEAVER CREEK-VAIL INC DBA BRAVO VAIL VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL: $95,000 · Arts & CultureBRAVO COLO…VILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $32,000 · Arts & CultureVILAR PERF…THE VAIL JAZZ FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 · Arts & CultureTHE VAIL J…+2 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureGUARDIAN SCHOLARS INC: $92,000 · EducationEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF EAGLE CNTY: $69,850 · EducationVAIL CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $15,000 · Education+4 more: $9,000 · EducationBetty Ford Alpine Gardens: $95,000 · Environment+2 more: $3,000 · EnvironmentVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $62,500 · HealthEAGLE VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH: $5,000 · HealthStarting Hearts: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $33,500 · Recreation & SportsWorld Class Accessibility Foundation: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,794,800Community Improvement$331,250Arts & Culture$258,400Education$185,850Environment$98,000Health$73,500Recreation & Sports$35,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $330,250 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetVAIL PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY: $97,400 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetBetty Ford Alpine Gardens: $95,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetBRAVO COLORADO AT BEAVER CREEK-VAIL INC DBA BRAVO VAIL VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL: $95,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGUARDIAN SCHOLARS INC: $92,000 over 9y, 36% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF EAGLE CNTY: $69,850 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $62,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetVAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $33,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetRACHEL'S NETWORK INC: $32,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetVILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $32,000 over 4y, 38% of budgetTHE VAIL JAZZ FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetVAIL CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStarting Hearts: $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetColorado Ski Museum Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetVAIL MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROUP INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFor The Good: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetVail Centre: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWorld Class Accessibility Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN VALLEY HORSE RESCUE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MERCANTILE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF HOPE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBorder Community Alliance Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVAIL MOUNTAIN SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVMI Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYSVILLE PLAYERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VAIL PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Betty Ford Alpine Gardens ↗
  • Who funds BRAVO COLORADO AT BEAVER CREEK-VAIL INC DBA BRAVO VAIL VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds GUARDIAN SCHOLARS INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF EAGLE CNTY ↗
  • Who funds VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
  • Who funds RACHEL'S NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds VILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VAIL JAZZ FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VAIL CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds WALKING MOUNTAINS ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Starting Hearts ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Ski Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds VAIL MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds For The Good ↗
  • Who funds Vail Centre ↗
  • Who funds World Class Accessibility Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO31.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Precourt Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Frechette Family Foundation · United Jewish Foundation · Frampton Family Charitable Foundation · The Ronald Davis Family Foundation · Borgen Family Foundation · Kelton Family Foundation · Mantz Foundation · The EPIK Foundation Inc · The Kelly and Sam Bronfman Family Foundation (Aka the Sam & Kelly Bronfma)

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Winmax Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Winmax Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Winmax Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Winmax Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Winmax’s filings →

    More from the funding graph