· Private foundation
The Williamsburg Christadelphian Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k35 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $139k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $990k
- $250k+1 grant · $258k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NGUYEN THI PHUNG TREASURER VIETNAM | $257,985 |
| CUDDLE TRUST | $181,740 |
| CHRISTADELPHIAN SHUNEM HOME UK | $149,000 |
| INDIA CHILD NUTRITION PROGRAMME | $126,576 |
| COPT | $122,500 |
| SOCIETY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT NEW F | $111,710 |
| JOHN ELTON ACBM PHILIPINES COORDIN | $111,000 |
| CAMBODIA BEC 8437 ABA LTD ACCOUNT | $108,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $78,821 |
| Individual grant recipient | $39,700 |
| ALL PAKISTAN CHRISTADELPHIAN CHURCH | $32,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $19,000 |
| MARTIN SHIRLEY JAMAICA REC BRO | $18,120 |
| Individual grant recipient | $17,865 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 6% of grant dollars ($632k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 94% that went abroad ($11M) is mapped below.
Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Beyond the US: 94% of all-years giving ($11M)
21 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 24% of The Williamsburg Christadelphian Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against -41% for those funded once.
97 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 65 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- NTNGUYEN THI PHUNG TREASURER VIETNAM6× · 2020–2025 · $1.5M
- CTCUDDLE TRUST9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M
- CCOPT9× · 2017–2025 · $838k
Funded once
- ATACBM THAILAND-T NUTTERone grant, 2021 · $100k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $81k
- BFBIWALI FAMILY (PAID TO AND TO VARIOUS VENDORS FBO)one grant, 2019 · $60k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 229 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Williamsburg Christadelphian Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Williamsburg Christadelphian Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Williamsburg Christadelphian Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Williamsburg Christadelphian Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Williamsburg Christadelphian’s filings →