Skip to content

· Private foundation

The William C and Dorothy T Troutman Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$122kEducation$42kHealth$19kCommunity Improvement$11kRecreation & Sports$11kArts & Culture$6kReligion$5kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$300k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NED SMITH CENTER$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NORTHERN DAUPHIN COUNTY YMCA$4,750
Individual grant recipient$4,000
GRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,000
MILLERSBURG LIONS CLUB$1,000
MILLERSBURG SENIOR CENTER$1,000
LIFELINE PREGNANCY CENTER$1,000
HEALTHY KIDS RUNNING SERIES$550
NORTHERN DAUPHIN HUMAN SERVICES CTR$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UPPER DAUPHIN HUMAN SERVICES CENTER: $1k → 12%UPPER DAUPHIN HUMAN SERVICES CENTER: $1k → 12%UPPER DAUPHIN HUMAN SERVICES CENTER: $1k → 12%UPPER DAUPHIN HUMAN SERVICES CENTER: $1k → 12%UPPER DAUPHIN HUMAN SERVICES CENTER: $1k → 12%UPPER DAUPHIN HUMAN SERVICES CENTER: $1k → 12%UPPER DAUPHIN HUMAN SERVICES CENTER: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$275k · 25 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
8

Total granted

$275k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+8%

Still filing today

24%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LIFELINE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +172%
  • UD
    UPPER DAUPHIN HUMAN SERVICES CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +7%
  • HK
    HEALTHY KIDS RUNNING SERIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • ML
    MILLERSBURG LITTLE LEAGUE ASSOC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • TU
    Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
7
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
La Salle University

See schedule o for complete mission statement.la salle is a lasallian catholic university committed to the principle that all knowledge is practical and empowering, filled with the capacity to transform lives. anchored in the living…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Lifeline Pregnancy Care Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NED SMITH CENTER: $63,500 · OtherNED SMITH CENTERNORTHERN DAUPHIN COUNTY YMCA: $39,750 · OtherNORTHERN DAUPHIN COUNTY YMCAIndividual grant recipient: $31,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $29,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPA COUNCIL ON FINANCIAL LITERACY: $10,000 · OtherMILLERSBURG SENIOR CENTER: $9,000 · Other+20 more: $68,550 · Other+20 moreAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · HealthLIFELINE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $9,000 · HealthMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $4,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $2,000 · EducationARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationUPPER DAUPHIN HUMAN SERVICES CENTER INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHY KIDS RUNNING SERIES: $4,250 · Animals
Other$251,800Health$19,000Education$14,000Human Services$7,000Animals$4,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIFELINE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $9,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetUPPER DAUPHIN HUMAN SERVICES CENTER INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetHEALTHY KIDS RUNNING SERIES: $4,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONS OF THE AMERICAN LEGION POST 919: $1,950 over 3y, 29% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UPPER DAUPHIN HUMAN SERVICES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY KIDS RUNNING SERIES ↗
  • Who funds MESSIAH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds ARCADIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SONS OF THE AMERICAN LEGION POST 919 ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The William C and Dorothy T Troutman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The William C and Dorothy T Troutman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The William C and Dorothy T Troutman Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The William C and Dorothy T Troutman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William C and Dorothy T Troutman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph