Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The William and Ginny Fink Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Social Science$30kPublic Benefit$15kCivil Rights$11kHealth$7kCommunity Improvement$5kScience & Tech$5kEducation$3kCrime & Legal$3k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,850
Median grant
7
States reached
$270k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATO INSTITUTE$2,600
LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC$2,350
THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE$2,100
FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION$1,850
CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE$1,850
FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION INC$850
COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE$850
ATLAS NETWORK$850
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$600
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 74% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $2k → 10%COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $850 → 14%LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $2k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION INC: $850 → 13%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $600 → 14%The Future of Freedom Foundation: $2k → 6%FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%The Independent Institute: $2k → 10%COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $750 → 14%Ludwig Von Mises Institute: $2k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $750 → 13%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%The Future of Freedom Foundation: $2k → 6%FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $2k → 10%Competitive Enterprise Institute: $750 → 14%LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE: $2k → 15%Foundation for Economic Education: $750 → 13%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%Future of Freedom Foundation: $2k → 6%FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%The Independent Institute: $2k → 10%Competitive Enterprise Institute: $750 → 14%Ludwig Von Mises Institute: $2k → 15%Foundation for Economic Education: $750 → 13%Evans Scholars Foundation: $500 → 14%ATLAS NETWORK: $850 → 7%Independent Institute: $2k → 10%Competitive Enterprise Institute: $750 → 14%Ludwig Von Miles Institute: $2k → 15%Foundation for Economic Education: $750 → 13%Evans Scholars Foundation: $500 → 14%Atlas Network: $750 → 7%INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $2k → 10%COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $750 → 14%LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE: $2k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $750 → 13%Atlas Network: $750 → 7%CATO INSTITUTE: $3k → 14%Atlas Network: $750 → 7%CATO INSTITUTE: $3k → 14%ATLAS NETWORK: $750 → 7%Cato Institute: $3k → 14%ATLAS NETWORK: $750 → 7%Cato Institute: $3k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $600 → 7%Cato Institute: $3k → 14%CATO INSTITUTE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$76k · 10 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$76k
$2k

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsPublic BenefitSocial ScienceEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CATO INSTITUTE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +93%
  • TI
    THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +58%
  • LV
    LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • LV
    Ludwig Von Miles Institute
    one grant, 2021 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
Frontiers of Freedom Institute

To educate the public on constitutional issues and public policy matters. We are dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, peace through strength, limited government, free enterprise, and the values embodied in the Declaration of…

Public Benefit
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
5
Independence Institute

The mission of independence institute is to empower individuals and to educate citizens,legislators and opinion makers about public policies that enhance personal and economic freedom.

Public Benefit
6
The Libertarian Institute

Disseminate information and education about pertinent economic, social and governmental topics, via print, web and other media to educate the public about the principles of LIbertarianism.

Education
7
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
8
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
9
Economic Policy Institute

Epi uses the tools of economics to bring the interests of low- and middle-income workers into economic policy discussions. epi's rigorous research and transformative ideas fortify worker organizing, build a shared understanding of how…

Social Science
10
Defense of Freedom Institute for Policy Studies Inc

To provide thoughtful, conservative solutions to the challenges presented by education, workforce, labor and employment issues.

Education
11
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
12
The Institute for Cultural Evolution

To advance political evolution in america to outgrow the hyper-partisan polarization that threatens our democracy.

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Competitive Enterprise Institute and the most unlike its peers is Ludwig Von Mises Institute for Austrian Economics Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE — $12,100 · OtherTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTELUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC — $11,350 · OtherLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INCATLAS NETWORK — $4,600 · OtherATLAS NETWORKCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE — $4,600 · OtherCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTEEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $3,100 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONLudwig Von Miles Institute — $2,250 · OtherLudwig Von Miles InstituteCATO INSTITUTE — $15,100 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTETHE FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION — $10,600 · Civil RightsTHE FUTURE OF FREED…INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE — $3,100 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTI…CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE — $7,100 · EnvironmentCHILDREN'S…Foundation for Economic Education Inc — $4,600 · Social Science
Other$38,000Public Benefit$15,100Civil Rights$13,700Environment$7,100Social Science$4,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $15,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE — $12,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC — $11,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION — $10,600 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE — $7,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Economic Education Inc — $4,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE — $4,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE — $3,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE
  • Who funds LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC
  • Who funds THE FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE
  • Who funds Foundation for Economic Education Inc
  • Who funds COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The William and Ginny Fink Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph