Skip to content

· Public charity

The White Rock Fund

The mission of the fund is to support church of christ congregations and ministers for the preaching of the gospel of our lord and savior, jesus christ.

$276k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$971kPublic Benefit$12kInternational$900
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $118,560, the rows itemized in this filing. The $275,902 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $157,342 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $95k
$11,160
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPPER VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST$13,200
North Bronx Church of Christ$13,200
Worcester Church of Christ$12,000
Dutchess County Church of Christ$12,000
MANCHESTER CHURCH OF CHRIST$12,000
NEW MILFORD CHURCH OF CHRIST$11,160
Individual grant recipient$10,800
Green Mountain Church of Christ$10,800
KITTERY MAINE CHURCH OF CHRIST$6,000
Greensburg Church of Christ$6,000
Horseheads Church of Christ$6,000
East Side Church of Christ$5,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 31% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Worcester Church of Christ: $12k → 11%Dutchess County Church of Christ: $12k → 9%North Bronx Church of Christ: $14k → 28%ROCK HILL CHURCH OF CHRIST: $11k → 5%BLANCO CHRUCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 8%WOODLANDS TX CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 9%NEW MILFORD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $27k → 9%MANCHESTER CHURCH OF CHRIST: $13k → 11%PINSON CHURCH OF CHRIST - BELGIUM: $15k → 15%UPPER VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $13k → 9%Green Mountain Church of Christ: $12k → 12%Worcester Church of Christ: $12k → 11%Dutchess County Church of Christ: $12k → 9%North Bronx Church of Christ: $13k → 28%WHITE ROCK CHURCH OF CHRIST: $22k → 14%NEW MILFORD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $22k → 9%MANCHESTER CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 11%UPPER VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $13k → 9%Green Mountain Church of Christ: $12k → 12%WORCESTER CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 11%North Bronx Church of Christ: $12k → 28%NEW MILFORD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $17k → 9%MANCHESTER CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 11%UPPER VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $13k → 9%Green Mountain Church of Christ: $12k → 12%Worcester Church of Christ: $12k → 11%North Bronx Church of Christ: $12k → 28%NEW MILFORD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $13k → 9%UPPER VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $13k → 9%Green Mountain Church of Christ: $11k → 12%Worcester Church of Christ: $12k → 11%North Bronx Church of Christ: $12k → 28%BELTLINE ROAD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $20k → 14%NEW MILFORD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 9%UPPER VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $13k → 9%Green Mountain Church of Christ: $11k → 12%Worcester Church of Christ: $11k → 11%BELTLINE ROAD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $20k → 14%CHRIST FOR TODAY: $12k → 9%UPPER VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 9%NORTH BRONX CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 28%CHRIST FOR TODAY: $12k → 9%UPPER VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 9%CASTLETON CHURCH OF CHRIST: $12k → 12%CHRIST FOR TODAY - NEW MILFORD: $12k → 9%CHRIST FOR TODAY: $12k → 9%NEW MILFORD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $11k → 9%NEW MILFORD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $11k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
RI
NM
TN
AL
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $115k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$60k · 52% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: MISSIONARY

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$45k · 39% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: MISSIONARY

East Asia and the Pacific$10k · 8% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MISSIONARY

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of The White Rock Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 14% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 8%.

The White Rock Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$807k · 16 repeat orgs$177k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
24

Total granted

$807k
$160k

Still filing today

6%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NEW MILFORD CHURCH OF CHRIST
    7× · 2017–2024 · $114k
  • UV
    UPPER VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST
    7× · 2017–2024 · $89k
  • NB
    NORTH BRONX CHURCH OF CHRIST
    7× · 2017–2024 · $86k · revenue -23%

Funded once

  • PC
    PINSON CHURCH OF CHRIST - BELGIUM
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • BC
    BLANCO CHRUCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • WT
    WOODLANDS TX CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/2
Grantees still filing
0/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW MILFORD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $113,811 · OtherNEW MILFORD CHURCH OF CHRISTUPPER VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $89,311 · OtherUPPER VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRISTWorcester Church of Christ: $81,271 · OtherWorcester Church of ChristGreen Mountain Church of Christ: $68,071 · OtherGreen Mountain Church of ChristIndividual grant recipient: $68,071 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMANCHESTER CHURCH OF CHRIST: $42,871 · OtherKITTERY MAINE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $41,071 · OtherBELTLINE ROAD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $40,000 · OtherKENT COUNTY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $34,000 · OtherWHITE ROCK CHURCH OF CHRIST: $31,800 · OtherCHURCH OF CHRIST IN CONCORD NEW HAMPSHIRE: $30,000 · Other+30 more: $233,691 · Other+30 moreNORTH BRONX CHURCH OF CHRIST: $85,871 · ReligionNORTH BRONX …Dutchess County Church of Christ: $24,000 · ReligionDutchess Cou…
Other$873,968Religion$109,871

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH BRONX CHURCH OF CHRIST: $85,871 over 7y, 6.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH BRONX CHURCH OF CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds Dutchess County Church of Christ ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The White Rock Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The White Rock Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY22–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The White Rock Fund?

    Find your warmest path to The White Rock Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on White Rock’s filings →

    More from the funding graph