Skip to content

· Private foundation

The West Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$12MEnvironment$520kArts & Culture$203kEducation$182kYouth Development$173kFood & Nutrition$66kHousing & Shelter$45kHuman Services$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$61,279
Median grant
1
States reached
$536k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEFFERSON COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUB$61,279
CASA WOMENS SHELTER$16,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%TRINITY VILLAGE: $7k → 22%TRINITY VILLAGE: $5k → 22%NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR: $55k → 22%CASA WOMENS SHELTER: $17k → 22%NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR: $5k → 22%NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR: $5k → 22%NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$574k · 10 repeat orgs$679k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$574k
$601k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+74%

Still filing today

40%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NT
    NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $66k · revenue +7%
  • TV
    TRINITY VILLAGE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $12k · revenue +14%
  • Washington and Lee University
    6× · 2018–2023 · $6k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • PB
    PINE BLUFF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $520k
  • AC
    AR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
  • JF
    JRMC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $12,263,293 · PhilanthropyARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCPINE BLUFF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $520,000 · OtherPINE BLUF…THE ARTS SCIENCE CENTER FOR SE AR: $237,760 · OtherTHE ARTS …JRMC SCHOOL OF NURSING: $125,266 · OtherJRMC SCHO…BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF JEFFERSON CO: $75,000 · OtherBOYS GIRL…JEFFERSON COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $61,279 · OtherAR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $45,100 · Other+6 more: $88,285 · Other+6 moreNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC: $66,000 · Human ServicesCOMMITTEE AGAINST SPOUSE ABUSE INC: $16,600 · Human ServicesTRINITY VILLAGE INC: $11,534 · Human ServicesWashington and Lee University: $6,000 · EducationSTRATFORD HALL: $100 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$12,263,293Other$1,152,690Human Services$94,134Education$6,000Arts & Culture$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $12,263,293 over 1y, 13% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC: $66,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetTRINITY VILLAGE INC: $11,534 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN ARTS: $2,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSTRATFORD HALL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE AGAINST SPOUSE ABUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN ARTS ↗
  • Who funds STRATFORD HALL ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The West Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The West Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The West Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The West Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on West’s filings →

    More from the funding graph