Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Weaving Through the Maze Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$5kHuman Services$2kEducation$2kCrime & Legal$930Arts & Culture$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$150
Median grant
5
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$500
ANA VALLES COSTS FOR DISSOLUTION -$400
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$240
SHRINERS HOSPITAL$150
MARCH OF DIMES$100
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$100
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $354 → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $50 → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $228 → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $50 → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $228 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $209 → 14%STARS: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6k · 8 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against +63% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$6k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+63%

Still filing today

75%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +120%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +392%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • AF
    ANGEL FUNERALS (ELSA MURWWENY HERMENEFLIDO VILLAGRAM)
    one grant, 2024 · $600
  • A
    ACDL
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
2
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
3
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
6
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Sunnyview Hospital and Rehabilitation Center

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.sunnyview rehabilitation hospital is a member of st. peter's health…

Health
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Responsible Television. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANA VALLES COSTS FOR DISSOLUTION: $900 · OtherANA VALLES COSTS FOR DISSOLUTIONANGEL FUNERALS (ELSA MURWWENY HERMENEFLIDO VILLAGRAM): $600 · OtherANGEL FUNERALS (ELSA MURWWENY HERMENEFLIDO VILLAGRAM)ACDL: $500 · OtherACDLIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVICKIE BOYD (AUTISTIC SON): $500 · OtherVICKIE BOYD (AUTISTIC SON)Individual grant recipient: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHATCH FAMILY MEDICAL & LIFE EXPENSES: $500 · OtherHATCH FAMILY MEDICAL & LIFE EXPENSESESTATE OF RANDY HATCH: $300 · OtherESTATE OF RANDY HATCHIndividual grant recipient: $200 · Other+4 more: $246 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,635 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $300 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RES…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,019 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PR…SCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $500 · Human ServicesSCOTTSDALE TRAININ…GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $200 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR T…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,589 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER T…FOUNDATION FOR RESPONSIBLE TELEVISION: $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$5,246Health$2,135Human Services$1,719Education$1,589Arts & Culture$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,635 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,589 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,019 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR RESPONSIBLE TELEVISION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR RESPONSIBLE TELEVISION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Weaving Through the Maze Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Weaving Through the Maze Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Weaving Through the Maze’s filings →

More from the funding graph