Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wasserman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$243k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$82k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$491kArts & Culture$97kEnvironment$67kEducation$56kReligion$29kRecreation & Sports$22kAnimals$17kPhilanthropy$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $157k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD OF CHANGE$82,000
SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$75,000
SARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$20,000
PLYMOUTH HARBOR FOUNDATION$12,500
ST LAURENCE UNIVERSITY$10,500
TEAM TONY CANCER FOUNDATION$6,000
CAMP SUNSHINE$6,000
YOEC$5,500
LEMUR CONSERVATOR FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SHRINERS HOSP FOR CHILDREN$2,500
WEST COAST BLACK THEATRE TROUP$2,500
THE PARKSIDE SCHOOL$2,000
AAP FOUNDATION$2,000
BUTTONWOOD FOUNDATION$1,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CAMP SUNSHINE: $6k → 9%WORLD OF CHANGE: $125k → 9%TEAM TONY CANCER FOUNDATION: $110k → 9%WORLD OF CHANGE: $91k → 9%WORLD OF CHANGE: $82k → 9%SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $75k → 9%SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $75k → 9%WORLD OF CHANGE: $61k → 9%WORLD OF CHANGE: $52k → 9%SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%TEAM TONY CANCER FOUNDATION: $45k → 9%TEAM TONY CANCER FOUNDATION: $30k → 9%TEAM TONY CANCER FOUNDATION: $30k → 9%SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%WELL IN THE DESERT: $20k → 9%SARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $20k → 9%WELL IN THE DESERT: $20k → 9%JACK AND JILL CANCER FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%OPERA ARTS: $15k → 9%WELL IN THE DESERT: $15k → 9%PLYMOUTH HARBOR FOUNDATION: $13k → 9%ST LAURENCE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 9%ST LAURENCE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 9%VAN WEZEL FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%VAN WEZEL FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%VAN WEZEL FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%SARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $10k → 9%VAN WEZEL FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10k → 9%WELL IN THE DESERT: $10k → 9%DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH: $10k → 9%YOEC: $8k → 9%CAMP SUNSHINE: $6k → 9%CAMP SUNSHINE: $6k → 9%TEAM TONY CANCER FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%YOEC: $6k → 9%YOEC: $6k → 9%DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH: $5k → 9%ST LAURENCE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 9%UNION COLLEGE: $5k → 9%UNION COLLEGE: $5k → 9%DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH: $5k → 9%YOEC: $5k → 9%LEMUR CONSERVATOR FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%UNION COLLEGE: $5k → 9%ST LAURENCE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 9%DOUGLAS CHAPEL: $5k → 9%LEMUR CONSERVATOR FOUNDATION: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 30 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
10

Total granted

$1.2M
$46k

Still filing today

17%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $225k · revenue +37%
  • TT
    TEAM TONY CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $221k · revenue +87% · 47% of their budget
  • I1
    IMPACT 100 SRQ INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • OA
    OPERA ARTS
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • JA
    JACK AND JILL CANCER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTH AMERICA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORLD OF CHANGE: $411,000 · OtherWORLD OF CHANGEWELL IN THE DESERT: $65,300 · OtherWELL IN THE DESERTSARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · OtherST LAURENCE UNIVERSITY: $31,000 · OtherSARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $30,000 · Other+33 more: $196,762 · Other+33 moreSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $225,000 · HealthSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION IN…TEAM TONY CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $221,000 · HealthTEAM TONY CANCER FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $16,000 · HealthIMPACT 100 SRQ INC: $7,500 · Philanthropy
Other$774,062Health$462,000Philanthropy$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $225,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTEAM TONY CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $221,000 over 5y, 47% of budgetSARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPLYMOUTH HARBOR INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT 100 SRQ INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM TONY CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT 100 SRQ INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wasserman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wasserman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wasserman’s filings →

More from the funding graph