Skip to content
The Walter Franklin and Dorothy G Covington Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Walter Franklin and Dorothy G Covington Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$88kPublic Safety & Disaster$66kHuman Services$44kFood & Nutrition$22kEducation$22kHousing & Shelter$22kAnimals$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$144k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERFAITH SVS COUNCIL$2,250
MID COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD$2,250
FAIRFIELDS VOL FIRE DEPT$2,250
Individual grant recipient$2,250
NORTHUMBERLAND CO LIBRARY$2,250
AFTON METHODIST CHURCH$2,250
Individual grant recipient$2,250
NORTHERN NECK FOOD BANK$2,250
Individual grant recipient$2,250
BETHANY METHODIST CHURCH$2,250
SMITH POINT SEA RESCUE$2,250
SHILOH BAPTIST CHURCH$2,250
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,250
MASONIC HOME OF VA$2,250
CALLAO VOL FIRE DEPT$2,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NORTHUMBERLAND YMCA: $3k → 5%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5k → 9%MASONIC HOME OF VA: $3k → 9%SMITH POINT SEA RESCUE: $5k → 13%NORTHERN NECK FOOD BANK: $3k → 16%NORTHUMBERLAND YMCA: $3k → 5%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $3k → 9%MASONIC HOME OF VA: $3k → 9%NORTHERN NECK FOOD BANK: $3k → 16%NORTHUMBERLAND YMCA: $3k → 5%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $3k → 9%MASONIC HOME OF VA: $3k → 9%INTERFAITH SVS COUNCIL: $3k → 13%NORTHERN NECK FOOD BANK: $3k → 16%NORTHUMBERLAND YMCA: $3k → 5%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $3k → 9%INTERFAITH SVS COUNCIL: $3k → 13%INTERFAITH SVS COUNCIL: $3k → 13%CALLAO VOL FIRE DEPT: $3k → 13%CALLAO RESCUE SQUAD: $3k → 13%CALLAO VOL FIRE DEPT: $3k → 13%CALLAO RESCUE SQUAD: $3k → 13%CALLAO VOL FIRE DEPT: $3k → 13%CALLAO RESCUE SQUAD: $3k → 13%FAIRFIELDS VOL FIRE DEPT: $3k → 13%SHILOH BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 13%NORTHUMBERLAND CO LIBRARY: $3k → 13%NORTHUMBERLAND CO RESCUE: $3k → 13%AFTON METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 13%BETHANY METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 13%MID COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD: $3k → 13%REEDVILLE FISHERMEN'S MUS: $3k → 13%FAIRFIELDS VOL FIRE DEPT: $3k → 13%SHILOH BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 13%NORTHUMBERLAND CO LIBRARY: $3k → 13%BETHANY METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 13%MID COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD: $3k → 13%NORTHUMBERLAND CO RESCUE: $3k → 13%AFTON METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 13%REEDVILLE FISHERMEN'S MUS: $3k → 13%FAIRFIELDS VOL FIRE DEPT: $3k → 13%SHILOH BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 13%MID COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD: $3k → 13%BETHANY METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 13%AFTON METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 13%NORTHUMBERLAND CO RESCUE: $3k → 13%NORTHUMBERLAND CO LIBRARY: $3k → 13%REEDVILLE FISHERMEN'S MUS: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$339k · 16 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
0

Total granted

$339k
$0

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CALLAO RESCUE SQUAD INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +41%
  • HH
    HEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +42%
  • TH
    TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +156% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    4/4
    Grantees still filing
    3/4
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Individual grant recipient: $22,113 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBETHANY METHODIST CHURCH: $22,105 · OtherBETHANY METHODIST CHURCHCALLAO RESCUE SQUAD INC: $22,104 · OtherCALLAO RESCUE SQUAD INCINTERFAITH SVS COUNCIL: $22,104 · OtherINTERFAITH SVS COUNCILIndividual grant recipient: $22,104 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHILOH BAPTIST CHURCH: $22,104 · OtherSHILOH BAPTIST CHURCHCALLAO VOL FIRE DEPT: $22,104 · OtherCALLAO VOL FIRE DEPTIndividual grant recipient: $22,103 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFAIRFIELDS VOL FIRE DEPT: $22,103 · OtherFAIRFIELDS VOL FIRE DEPTMASONIC HOME OF VA: $22,103 · OtherMASONIC HOME OF VAMID COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD: $22,103 · OtherMID COUNTY RESCUE SQUADTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $22,103 · OtherTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCNORTHUMBERLAND CO LIBRARY: $22,103 · OtherNORTHUMBERLAND CO LIBRARYAFTON METHODIST CHURCH: $22,102 · OtherAFTON METHODIST CHURCH+1 more: $6,938 · OtherHEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $22,104 · Food & Nutrition
    Other$316,396Food & Nutrition$22,104

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALLAO RESCUE SQUAD INC: $22,104 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetHEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $22,104 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $22,103 over 8y, 32% of budgetSMITH POINT SEA RESCUE: $6,938 over 2y, 1.6% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CALLAO RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
    • Who funds HEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC ↗
    • Who funds TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
    • Who funds SMITH POINT SEA RESCUE ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Walter Franklin and Dorothy G Covington Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Walter Franklin and Dorothy G Covington Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to The Walter Franklin and Dorothy G Covington Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to The Walter Franklin and Dorothy G Covington Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Walter Franklin and Dorothy G Covington’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home