Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Walmilly Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2019
9
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

85% of The Walmilly Foundation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The Walmilly Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $73k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
17
8
18
6
19
6
20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Philanthropy$563kHealth$106kArts & Culture$77kHousing & Shelter$69kReligion$14kEducation$10kAnimals$9kInternational$6kOther$0
02FY2019 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $51k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE KING OF THAILAND$20,000
UNION RESCUR MISSION$19,000
LOS ANGELES MISSION$12,000
THE HUNTINGTON LIBRARY$5,000
PASADENA HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BRAILLE INSTITUTE$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS$1,500
JAPANESE AMERICA NATIONAL MESEUM$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION RESCUR MISSION: $19k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $14k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$120k · 6 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
20

Total granted

$120k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
AnimalsHealthArts & CultureInternationalRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UR
    UNION RESCUE MISSION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $41k · revenue +125%
  • HE
    HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $38k · revenue +99%
  • PH
    PASADENA HUMANE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $6k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • CT
    CENTRE THEATRE GROUP
    one grant, 2018 · $12k
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +63%
  • UC
    UCLA CENTER OF CHINESE STUDIES
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
2
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
3
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
4
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
7
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

8
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
The Animal Medical Center

Dedicated to providing compassionate and collaborative care to animals and to leading the advancement of veterinary medicine through innovative clinical research and education.

Animals
10
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
11
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
12
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Society of Ventura County and the most unlike its peers is Optimist Blind Youth Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $563,347 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDUSC ARCADIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $80,000 · HealthUSC ARCADIA…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $10,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINA…THE KING OF THAILAND — $20,000 · OtherTHE KING OF …CENTRE THEATRE GROUP — $11,600 · OtherCENTRE THEAT…UCLA CENTER OF CHINESE STUDIES — $10,000 · OtherUCLA CENTER …THE MUSIC CENTER — $7,860 · OtherTHE MUSIC CE…WAT PADHAMMACHART — $5,000 · OtherWAT PADHAMMA…Individual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual g…BRAILLE INSTITUTE — $5,000 · OtherBRAILLE INST…Individual grant recipient — $3,500 · OtherSUDDHAVASA BUDDHIST MEDITATION CENTER — $8,000 · OtherSUDDHAVASA B…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $6,000 · OtherMEDECINS SAN…+14 more — $9,075 · Other+14 moreUNION RESCUE MISSION — $40,500 · Human ServicesHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY — $37,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $250 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES MISSION INC — $28,000 · Housing & ShelterPASADENA HUMANE — $6,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY — $500 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc — $500 · Animals
Community Improvement$563,347Health$90,000Other$91,035Human Services$40,500Arts & Culture$37,750Housing & Shelter$28,000Animals$8,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $563,347 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSC ARCADIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION — $40,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY — $37,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPASADENA HUMANE — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPTIMIST BLIND YOUTH ASSOCIATION — $2,500 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWARM BLANKETS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC DBA KINSHIP UNITED — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC — $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Walmilly Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph