Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Vk Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0165% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$14kPhilanthropy$13kReligion$10kArts & Culture$9kFood & Nutrition$3kInternational$3kHealth$2kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$137k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIV OF WYOMING FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
GURDWARA$1,000
SOMEONE CARES SOUP LITCHEN$1,000
CSUF$1,000
SOUP KITCHEN$1,000
ROTARY CLUB$210
LOS ANGELES MISSION$100
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SAN KARA EYE FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%SOCIAL GOLD FUND: $1k → 9%SURJEET SING: $3k → 10%POLAR SCHOOL: $1k → 11%NO KID HUNGRY: $1k → 14%THE HINDU TEMPLE: $1k → 21%UNIV OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%SURJIT SINGH: $2k → 10%RAMESH GUPTA: $5k → 11%AYUDA FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%UNIV OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%SURJIT SINGH: $2k → 10%TEEN CHALLENGE: $1k → 11%UNIV OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%SOUP KITCHEN: $1k → 10%UNIV OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%HIND TEMPLE: $5k → 10%CSUF: $2k → 10%CSUF: $1k → 10%CSUF: $1k → 10%DAYANAND ANATHALYA: $900 → 10%CSUF: $830 → 10%CSUF: $800 → 10%CSUF: $730 → 10%SOMEONE CARES SOUP LITCHEN: $1k → 10%PRANAV TELWAR: $8k → 10%AARTI WADJERA: $7k → 10%UTKURSM WADMERA: $5k → 10%SURJIT SINT: $2k → 10%THE MISSIONARY BROTHERS: $2k → 10%EKAL VIUALAUA: $2k → 10%ASHA: $1k → 10%EKAL VIUALAUA: $1k → 10%RADHA RAMAN TEMPLE: $1k → 10%RAJASTHAN TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY: $1k → 10%KANPUR HINDU ANATHALYA: $980 → 10%THE EARTH SAVIOURS: $940 → 10%SANTAN DHARM SABHA: $940 → 10%KANPUR HINDU: $896 → 10%GURDWARA: $1k → 10%GURDWARA: $1k → 10%JAGDISH CHOPRA: $1k → 10%GEETA CHARITABLE: $940 → 10%GURDWARA SINGH SABHA: $1k → 10%GURDWAR: $1k → 10%SATISN GULANI: $4k → 10%SATISN GULANI: $2k → 10%SATISN GULANI: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
NY
WY
CA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$50k · 15 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +111% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
46

Total granted

$50k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%
+28%

Still filing today

13%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +111%
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB
    7× · 2017–2024 · $8k
  • C
    CSUF
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
3
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
4
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
5
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
6
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
7
United Way of San Diego County

To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.

Philanthropy
8
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
9
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
10
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
11
Southern California Grantmakers

Southern california grantmakers (scg) is the regional association for philanthropists and grantmakers working to make a difference in our communities and around the world. we are a leadership hub for our members to connect with each other,…

Philanthropy
12
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Anaheim Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROTARY CLUB: $8,086 · OtherROTARY CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,142 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCSUF: $6,610 · OtherCSUFIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,110 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,960 · OtherSURJIT SINGH: $3,750 · Other+53 more: $49,830 · Other+53 moreUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $9,500 · EducationUNIVERSIT…SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $1,000 · EducationSOCIAL GO…SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $2,000 · HealthCHOC FOUNDATION: $100 · HealthANAHEIM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200 · PhilanthropyLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $100 · Housing & Shelter
Other$109,988Education$10,500Health$2,100Philanthropy$200Housing & Shelter$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOMEONE CARES SOUP KITCHEN: $1,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANAHEIM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds SOMEONE CARES SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Vk Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Vk Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vk Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph