Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Virginia R Powers and Frederic B Powers Jr Family Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2018
11
Grants FY2018
3
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Religion$23kYouth Development$13kRecreation & Sports$10kHealth$3kEducation$3kEnvironment$2kPhilanthropy$2kFood & Nutrition$500Other$0
02FY2018 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k10 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$877
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PIUS CHURCH$14,200
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF INDIAN RIVER$2,922
ST VINCENTS HOSPTIAL$2,000
1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA$1,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MT VERNON$1,000
JOHNS ISLAND FOUNDATION$1,000
WOMEN'S CARE CENTER$1,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$500
GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER$500
SHINING LIGHT GARDEN FOUNDTION$500
AT JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$35
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SHINING LIGHT GARDEN FOUNDTION: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$38k · 6 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$38k
$14k

Still filing today

0%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
EducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsAnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    ST PIUS CHURCH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF INDIAN RIVER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $9k
  • SV
    ST VINCENTS HOSPTIAL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k

Funded once

  • FH
    FLOAT HOPE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +164%
  • IR
    INDIAN RIVER IMPACT 100
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • SA
    SUFFIELD ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairfield University

To establish, organize, maintain and conduct an institution for secondary, undergraduate and graduate education in the state of connecticut, and to perform such other works of education, charity and religion. see schedule o.

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
4
Indiana University Foundation

The Indiana University Foundation (IUF) maximizes private philanthropic support for Indiana University by fostering lifelong relationships with key stakeholders and providing advancement leadership and fundraising services for (Continued…

Education
5
Trinity College of Florida Inc

The vision of Trinity College of Florida is to be the premier provider of a multifaceted and diversified higher learning four-year college which cultivates spiritual disciplines such as scripture study and directing learning toward what is…

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
8
Foxcroft School

Foxcroft's mission is to help every girl explore her unique voice and to develop the skills, confidence, and courage to share it with the world with emphasis on Our Values of Respect, Integrity, Kindness, Service.

Education
9
Saint Andrew's School of Boca Raton Inc

Saint andrew's school is an independent school founded in the episcopal tradition. our mission is to build a community of learners, provide excellence in education, and nurture each student in mind, body, and spirit.

Education
10
Suffolk University

Description of organization mission: at suffolk university we are driven by the power of education, inclusion, and engagement to change lives and positively impact communities. committed to excellence, we provide students with experiential…

Education
11
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
12
Canterbury School Inc

Canterbury school is pk3-12, coeducational, college preparatory day school with approximately 650 students. the school is dedicated to academic excellence within a caring and supportive community emphasizing character, leadership and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Indian River County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Suffield Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PIUS CHURCH: $18,300 · OtherST PIUS CHURCHBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF INDIAN RIVER: $8,672 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF INDIAN RIVERST VINCENTS HOSPTIAL: $4,250 · OtherST VINCENTS HOSPTIALWOMEN'S CARE CENTER: $2,500 · OtherWOMEN'S CARE CENTERGIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER: $2,500 · OtherGIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTERBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MT VERNON: $2,000 · Other+3 more: $1,225 · OtherFLOAT HOPE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsFLOAT HOPE OF INDIAN…SUFFIELD ACADEMY: $1,000 · EducationGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $1,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $500 · EducationTHE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentShining Light Garden Foundation Inc: $500 · Human ServicesDOGS FOR LIFE INC: $180 · Animals
Other$39,447Recreation & Sports$10,000Education$2,500Philanthropy$2,000Environment$1,000Human Services$500Animals$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUFFIELD ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShining Light Garden Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOGS FOR LIFE INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Virginia R Powers and Frederic B Powers Jr Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Virginia R Powers and Frederic B Powers Jr Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • United Way of Indian River County Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Virginia R Powers and Frederic B Powers Jr Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Virginia R Powers and Frederic B Powers Jr Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Virginia R Powers and Frederic B Powers Jr Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph