Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

California · Private foundation

The Veronica & Henry Bialer Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$154k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
16
Grants FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$20,000
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$4.2M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2025 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Temple Bat Yahm$18,0001n/a
Temple Akiba of Culver City$18,0001n/a
Pacific Symphony$15,00010%
Orange County Museum of Art$10,0001n/a
Whittier College$10,00010%
Fresh Beginnings Ministries$2,5001n/a
Sharewell$1,00010%

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($79k), not named here.

Compare The Veronica & Henry Bialer Charitable Foundation Inc with peer funders

About The Veronica & Henry Bialer Charitable Foundation Inc

How much does The Veronica & Henry Bialer Charitable Foundation Inc give?
The Veronica & Henry Bialer Charitable Foundation Inc reported 16 grants totaling $153,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
Who are The Veronica & Henry Bialer Charitable Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2025 to FY2025: Temple Bat Yahm ($18k), Temple Akiba of Culver City ($18k), Pacific Symphony ($15k).
Does The Veronica & Henry Bialer Charitable Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Where is The Veronica & Henry Bialer Charitable Foundation Inc based?
The Veronica & Henry Bialer Charitable Foundation Inc is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Veronica & Henry Bialer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home