Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Vanderwerf Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$96kAnimals$73kHuman Services$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$32kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$508k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LIBERTY BARN$15,000
FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION$5,000
MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATIO$5,000
SMILE TRAIN$5,000
REACH OUT WORLDWIDE$5,000
OPERATION CATNIP$5,000
ELEV8HOPE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIFELINE PILOTS INC: $3k → 14%ELEV8HOPE: $6k → 10%ELEV8HOPE: $5k → 10%ELEV8HOPE: $5k → 10%ELEV8HOPE: $5k → 10%ELEV8HOPE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CA
VA
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$222k · 7 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$222k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+102%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RO
    REACH OUT WORLDWIDE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $32k · revenue +50%
  • FW
    FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +88%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $29k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • MT
    MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +64%
  • OC
    OPERATION CHRISTMAS CHILD
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Miracle Flights

Miracle flights is a national charity that provides free commercial airline tickets for u.s. residents in need of distant medical care not available in their own communities.

—
2
Wings of Hope

To save and change lives through the power of aviation. throughout its 60-year history, wings of hope has provided lifesaving care and access to resources in more than 50 countries. the organization was nominated twice for the nobel peace…

International
3
Operation Walk Florida Inc

The goal of our missions trips is to provide state of the art medical treatments to those in desperate need that otherwise have no access to treatment locally. also, exchange medical knowledge and techniques to improve the standard of care…

Human Services
4
Kids Mobility Network Inc

Kids Mobility Network provides wheelchairs, adaptive bikes, and other medical equipment to children with disabilities. We serve the uninsured and under-insured families that cannot obtain this necessary and expensive medical equipment…

Human Services
5
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
6
Mission Flight

Our mission is to fly medical patients to critically needed appointments within California as well as to fly volunteer teams into remote, impoverished areas of Mexico. Our passion is to connect people who are isolated and in poverty with…

International
7
Chair the Hope Inc

Providing wheelchairs to individuals worldwide

Philanthropy
8
Lifebox Foundation Inc

To improve the safety of healthcare in low and middle-income countries.

Philanthropy
9
Sign Fracture Care International

Sign partners with overseas surgeons to build sustainable orthopaedic capacity by donating education, instruments, and implants. by working with teaching hospitals and hosting educational conferences worldwide, sign equips surgeons to heal…

Health
10
Vital Flight Inc

Provide access for people in need seeking free air transportation to specialized health care facilities or distant destinations due to family, community and national crisis. we serve patients in florida, the islands of the bahamas and…

Human Services
11
Medical Mission International - Usa

To relieve and alleviate human suffering, misery, poverty, sickness, and distress throughout the world by providing emergency medical relief, funding, and support.

Religion
12
Packages From Home

To send care and comfort packages to deployed american military heroes who are stationed in active duty theaters around the world, as well as to facilitate activities that elevate morale of all veterans

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Free Wheelchair Mission; the most unlike its peers is Liberty Barn Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATIO: $33,000 · OtherMULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATIOSMILE TRAIN INC: $28,750 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCOPERATION CATNIP: $27,500 · OtherOPERATION CATNIPIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $3,000 · OtherLiberty Barn Inc: $45,000 · AnimalsLiberty Barn IncFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $30,000 · HealthFREE WHEELCHAIR …NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · HealthNATIONAL BREAST …THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $1,750 · HealthREACH OUT WORLDWIDE INC: $31,500 · Public Safety & DisasterREACH OUT WORL…Elev8hope Inc: $26,000 · Human ServicesElev8hope IncLIFELINE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesLIFELINE INCMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $4,833 · Philanthropy
Other$97,250Animals$45,000Health$34,250Public Safety & Disaster$31,500Human Services$28,500Philanthropy$4,833

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLiberty Barn Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetREACH OUT WORLDWIDE INC: $31,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $30,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $28,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetElev8hope Inc: $26,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $4,833 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Liberty Barn Inc ↗
  • Who funds REACH OUT WORLDWIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Elev8hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Vanderwerf Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Vanderwerf Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vanderwerf’s filings →

    More from the funding graph