Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Van Kim Llta Nguyen Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Health$19kFood & Nutrition$14kReligion$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kInternational$2kHuman Services$2kEducation$1kRecreation & Sports$855Other$0
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT VIETNAM$2,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN HOSPITAL$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BODHGAYA HEART FDN$1,000
VN DI-LINH LEPROXY CAMP$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
RADY CHILDREN HOSPITAL MC 5005$1,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN HOSPITAL$1,000
CRESCENT CHURCH$300
CRESCENT CHURCH$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNION METHODIST CHURCH: $800 → 10%PROJECT VIETNAM: $2k → 10%CA STATE PARK FOUNDATION: $100 → 10%RADY CHILDREN HOSPITAL MC 5005: $1k → 11%SAKYA BUDDHIST MEDITATION ASSOCIATION: $100 → 11%CA VIPASSANA MEDITATION CENTER: $2k → 14%DI LINH LEPROXY CENTER: $4k → 14%MAHA VIHARA PIRIVERA ASGIRYA MONASTERY: $10k → 22%ST MAXIMILIAN KOLBE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $500 → 16%UNIVERSITY OF BAHAMAS: $3k → 15%HOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $200 → 10%CRESCENT LAKE CHRISTIAN CT: $800 → 8%UNION METHODIST CHURCH: $500 → 10%UNION METHODIST CHURCH: $500 → 10%PROJECT VIETNAM: $2k → 10%RADY CHILDREN HOSPITAL MC 5005: $500 → 11%CA VIPASSANA MEDITATION CENTER: $1k → 14%DI LINH LEPROXY CENTER: $1k → 14%CA VIPASSANA MEDITATION CENTER: $2k → 22%LO-DUC CATHOLIC CHURCH: $200 → 16%HOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $200 → 10%CRESCENT LAKE CHRISTIAN CT: $700 → 8%UNION METHODIST CHURCH: $400 → 10%UNION METHODIST CHURCH: $400 → 10%SRILANKA MONKS: $1k → 10%RADY CHILDREN HOSPITAL MC 5005: $500 → 11%CA VIPASSANA MEDITATION CENTER: $500 → 14%DI LINH LEPROXY CENTER: $1k → 14%LA SALLE SISTERS: $500 → 16%VN EVANGELICAL CHURCH: $200 → 10%CRESCENT LAKE CHRISTIAN CT: $600 → 8%SPARKS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $300 → 10%TRUNG THU HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI: $300 → 10%JACOB & CUSHMAN: $700 → 11%CRESCENT CHURCH: $300 → 8%TRUNG THU HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI: $200 → 10%CORREIA MIDDLE SCHOOL: $250 → 11%CRESCENT CHURCH: $200 → 8%RELIEF VN COVID: $1k → 10%JACOB & CUSHMAN: $400 → 11%VN DI-LINH LEPROXY CAMP: $1k → 10%BRAILLE INSTITUDE OF AMERICA 741: $100 → 11%VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA: $450 → 11%BODHGAYA HEART FUND: $3k → 11%BODHGAYA HEART FDN: $1k → 11%SD SALVATION ARMY: $700 → 11%SD SALVATION ARMY: $500 → 11%SAN DIEGO POINT LOMA HIGH SCHOOL: $755 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NV
IA
PA
CA
MO
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$32k · 12 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +145% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2020, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$32k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+145%
+24%

Still filing today

8%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $7k · revenue +145%
  • DL
    DI LINH LEPROXY CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $6k
  • CV
    CA VIPASSANA MEDITATION CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k

Funded once

  • MV
    MAHA VIHARA PIRIVERA ASGIRYA MONASTERY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • BH
    BODHGAYA HEART FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF BAHAMAS
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAHA VIHARA PIRIVERA ASGIRYA MONASTERY: $10,000 · OtherMAHA VIHARA PIRIVERA ASGIRYA MONASTERYDI LINH LEPROXY CENTER: $5,900 · OtherDI LINH LEPROXY CENTERCA VIPASSANA MEDITATION CENTER: $4,500 · OtherCA VIPASSANA MEDITATION CENTERPROJECT VIETNAM: $4,000 · OtherPROJECT VIETNAMBODHGAYA HEART FUND: $3,000 · OtherBODHGAYA HEART FUNDUNIVERSITY OF BAHAMAS: $3,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF BAHAMASUNION METHODIST CHURCH: $2,600 · OtherCRESCENT LAKE CHRISTIAN CT: $2,100 · OtherRADY CHILDREN HOSPITAL MC 5005: $2,000 · Other+23 more: $12,155 · Other+23 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILD…BODHGAYA HEART FOUNDATIN: $1,000 · Religion
Other$49,255Health$7,000Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAKYAMUNI BUDDHIST MEDITATION ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BODHGAYA HEART FOUNDATIN ↗
  • Who funds SAKYAMUNI BUDDHIST MEDITATION ASSOCIATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Van Kim Llta Nguyen Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Van Kim Llta Nguyen Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Van Kim Llta Nguyen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph