Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ullo Family Foundation Inc #96-706670

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$64kHuman Services$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kHealth$25kReligion$19kFood & Nutrition$12kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$354k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$10,000
NEWTOWN SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION INC$6,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TX$5,500
MARTHA'S TABLE$4,124
SAINT ROSE OF LIMA ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIONAL EDUCATION FOR ASSISTANCE DOG SERVICES INC: $5k → 11%CHILDREN IN CRISIS INC: $5k → 8%NATIONAL EDUCATION FOR ASSISTANCE DOG SERVICES INC: $5k → 11%CHILDREN IN CRISIS INC: $5k → 8%CHILDREN IN CRISIS INC: $4k → 8%CHILDREN IN CRISIS INC: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$234k · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$234k
$0

Still filing today

82%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    Newtown Scholarship Association Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +37%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $35k · revenue +167%
  • CI
    CHILDREN IN CRISIS INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $17k · revenue +7%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Childrens House International

    Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

    —
    2
    Childnet Inc

    Childnet's mission is to protect broward and palm beach counties' abused, abandoned and neglected children, to ensure their safety and to promptly provide them with a permanent, loving home.

    Human Services
    3
    Miami Childrens Initiative Inc

    The mission is to create a community-based network that develops coordinates and provides quality education accessible health care youth development programs opportunities for employment and safe neighborhoods for children and families…

    Community Improvement
    4
    Crisis Nursery

    Crisis nursery creates an "island of safety" dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect by providing 24-hour emergency care for children and support to strengthen families in crisis.

    —
    5
    New Road Missions

    We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

    Religion
    6
    Children in Conflict Inc

    Vision: a world where no child's life is torn apart by war.children in conflict works tirelessly to restore hope, safety and childhoods to children whose lives are affected by war.

    Human Services
    7
    Santa Rosa Kids' House Inc

    To deliver a well coordinated and multi-disciplined response to child abuse in an environment that puts children first

    Youth Development
    8
    Curesearch for Children's Cancer

    Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

    Health
    9
    Crossnore Communities for Children

    Crossnore communities for children champions the well being of children and families by fostering innovative change that weaves a fabric of resilience in homes, schools, and communities.

    Health
    10
    Children's Hospital

    Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

    Health
    11
    Kids Need to Read

    Kids need to read helps children to discover the joy of reading and the power of a literate mind by providing inspiring books and literacy programs to underfunded schools, libraries, and community agencies across the united states,…

    Education
    12
    National Children's Center Inc

    To provide a lifetime of opportunities for people in our community with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live full, meaningful and productive lives.

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cape Cod Children's Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Eleanor Johnson Youth Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    8/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Newtown Scholarship Association Inc: $70,268 · OtherNewtown Scholarship Association IncPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TX: $26,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TXSAINT ROSE OF LIMA ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $22,350 · OtherSAINT ROSE OF LIMA ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCHWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $35,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KI…CHILDREN IN CRISIS INC: $16,624 · Human ServicesCHILDREN IN C…NEADS INC: $10,650 · Human ServicesNEADS INCMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $16,124 · Food & NutritionCAPE COD CHILDREN'S PLACE INC: $11,365 · EducationGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $11,100 · PhilanthropyELEANOR JOHNSON YOUTH CENTER INC: $10,365 · Youth DevelopmentST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 · Health
    Other$118,618International$35,000Human Services$27,274Food & Nutrition$16,124Education$11,365Philanthropy$11,100Youth Development$10,365Health$4,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNewtown Scholarship Association Inc: $70,268 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN IN CRISIS INC: $16,624 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $16,124 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE COD CHILDREN'S PLACE INC: $11,365 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $11,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEADS INC: $10,650 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetELEANOR JOHNSON YOUTH CENTER INC: $10,365 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Newtown Scholarship Association Inc ↗
    • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
    • Who funds CHILDREN IN CRISIS INC ↗
    • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
    • Who funds CAPE COD CHILDREN'S PLACE INC ↗
    • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds NEADS INC ↗
    • Who funds ELEANOR JOHNSON YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Ullo Family Foundation Inc #96-706670 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ullo Family Foundation Inc #96-706670. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
    • Cape Cod Children's Place Inc: 47% of income from government
    • Neads Inc: 1% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ullo Family Foundation Inc #96-706670’s filings →

    More from the funding graph