Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Tov Vchesed Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$148k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$98kArts & Culture$12kEducation$9kHealth$180Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $22,470, the rows itemized in this filing. The $147,712 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $125,242 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$3,800
Median grant
—
States reached
$37k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cong. Imrie Chine Delatyn$12,000
Mosdos Yetev Lev of Antwerp Inc.$5,000
Cong. Mosdos Toldos Aharon$3,800
T T Lizensk$1,000
Tomche Shabos of Rockland County$500
Cong Noem E Leizensk$170
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 1% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%SEE ATTACHED LISTING: $158k → 14%CONG KHAL BAIS HALEVI: $1k → 14%ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY: $180 → 20%CONGREGATION MOSDOS TOLDOS AHARON: $19k → 14%CONG KOLLEL OHEL YOSEF PUPA: $2k → 20%CONGREGATION MOSDOS TOLDOS AHARON: $17k → 14%MOSDOS YETEV LEV OF ANTWERP INC: $1k → 20%CONGREGATION OSHER BCHAIM INC: $7k → 14%BINYAN YERUSHLAIM: $200 → 20%CONGREGATION MOSDOS TOLDOS AHARON: $5k → 14%ZICHRON MENACHEM INC: $2k → 14%ZICHRON MENACHEM INC: $1k → 14%VARIOUS: $750 → 14%YESHIVA BAIS BINYOMIN: $250 → 14%CONG DERECH EMES: $180 → 14%DRESSED WITH DIGNITY: $7k → 14%DRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC: $2k → 14%CONG NOAM ELIEZER: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$57k · 4 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +490% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
12

Total granted

$57k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+490%
-5%

Still filing today

25%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CONGREGATION MOSDOS TOLDOS AHARON
    3× · 2017–2022 · $41k
  • DW
    DRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC
    2× · 2017–2022 · $9k · revenue +490%
  • V
    Various
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5k

Funded once

  • CY
    Cong. Yetev Lev D Satmar of 15th Ave
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • CO
    CONGREGATION OSHER BCHAIM INC
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • YT
    Yeshiva Tzon Yosef D'pupa
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION MOSDOS TOLDOS AHARON: $40,620 · OtherCONGREGATION MOSDOS TOLDOS AHARONCong. Yetev Lev D Satmar of 15th Ave: $30,000 · OtherCong. Yetev Lev D Satmar of 15th AveCong. Imrie Chine Delatyn: $12,000 · OtherCong. Imrie Chine DelatynCONGREGATION OSHER BCHAIM INC: $7,000 · OtherCONGREGATION OSHER BCHAIM INCMosdos Yetev Lev of Antwerp Inc.: $5,000 · OtherVarious: $4,510 · Other+14 more: $17,450 · Other+14 moreDRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC: $9,000 · EducationROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $180 · Philanthropy
Other$116,580Education$9,000Philanthropy$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tov Vchesed Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tov Vchesed Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $158k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tov Vchesed’s filings →

    More from the funding graph