Skip to content

· Public charity

The Tom and Susan Durant Foundation Inc

To create fundraising activities in north texas and make financial contributions to local charities.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$445k
Largest
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$912kYouth Development$677kRecreation & Sports$279kArts & Culture$113kPublic Benefit$103kHuman Services$59kPhilanthropy$55kScience & Tech$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k14 grants · $777k
  • $250k+1 grant · $445k
$55,214
Median grant
—
States reached
$153k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE$445,000
TRINITY HIGH-ANGEL FUN$57,357
VAST$57,357
GREGG PEARSON FOUNDATION$55,214
AIRBORNE ANGEL CADETS$55,214
GALLANT FEW$55,214
6 STONES$55,214
RISE ADAPTIVE SPORTS$55,214
TREE OF NORTH TEXAS$55,214
Individual grant recipient$55,214
ATF$55,214
CHATI- T 2000$55,214
MIRACLE LEAGUE$55,214
Individual grant recipient$55,214
THE SALVAGE YARD$55,214
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 12 repeat orgs$494k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$2.4M
$328k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • G
    GRACE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $635k
  • GF
    GALLANT FEW
    3× · 2022–2024 · $253k
  • V
    VAST
    3× · 2022–2024 · $208k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $125k
  • CS
    COMMUNITY STORE HOUSE
    one grant, 2022 · $59k
  • 1M
    12TH MAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2022–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2022 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE: $634,584 · OtherGRACEGALLANT FEW: $253,464 · OtherGALLANT FEWVAST: $207,915 · OtherVASTRISE ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $198,298 · OtherRISE ADAPTIVE SPORTSTRINITY HIGH-ANGEL FUN: $188,941 · OtherTRINITY HIGH-ANGEL FUN6 STONES: $186,798 · Other6 STONESAIRBORNE ANGEL CADETS: $184,494 · OtherAIRBORNE ANGEL CADETSIndividual grant recipient: $155,149 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $125,096 · OtherCHATI- T 2000: $115,310 · OtherTHE SALVAGE YARD: $113,482 · OtherATF: $102,810 · Other+10 more: $458,860 · Other+10 more
Other$2,925,201

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tom and Susan Durant’s filings →

More from the funding graph