Skip to content
The Timothy E and Melissa M Moriarty Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Timothy E and Melissa M Moriarty Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$465k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.5MPhilanthropy$140kHealth$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $395k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OAK KNOLL SCHOOL$210,000
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE$125,000
DELBARTON SCHOOL$60,000
THE PINGRY CORPORATION$25,000
DENISON UNIVERSITY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 45% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $125k → 7%CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $6k → 10%UPPER SARANAC FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%DENISON UNIVERSITY: $25k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $20k → 14%DELBARTON SCHOOL: $60k → 4%THE PINGRY CORPORATION: $25k → 5%PINGRY: $25k → 7%OAK KNOLL SCHOOL: $210k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $200k → 10%BOSTON COLLEGE: $125k → 7%CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $3k → 10%UPPER SARANAC FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%DELBARTON SCHOOL: $60k → 4%PINGRY: $25k → 5%PINGRY: $25k → 7%OAK KNOLL SCHOOL: $20k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $10k → 10%BOSTON COLLEGE: $115k → 7%CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $3k → 10%UPPER SARANAC FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%DELBARTON SCHOOL: $60k → 4%PINGRY: $20k → 7%OAK KNOLL SCHOOL: $20k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $10k → 10%BOSTON COLLEGE: $75k → 7%UPPER SARANAC FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%DELBARTON SCHOOL: $60k → 4%OAK KNOLL SCHOOL: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $10k → 10%BOSTON COLLEGE: $75k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%OAK KNOLL SCHOOL: $10k → 10%BOSTON COLLEGE: $50k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 8 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$1.6M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-8%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $565k · revenue +53%
  • TP
    THE PINGRY CORPORATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $120k · revenue +17%
  • University of Chicago
    6× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SV
    Summit Volunteer First Aid Squad Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OAK KNOLL SCHOOL: $270,000 · OtherOAK KNOLL SCHOOLDELBARTON SCHOOL: $240,000 · OtherDELBARTON SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $230,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VERMONTUPPER SARANAC FOUNDATION: $140,000 · OtherUPPER SARANAC FOUNDATIONTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $565,343 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGETHE PINGRY CORPORATION: $120,000 · EducationTHE PINGRY CORPORATIONUniversity of Chicago: $70,131 · EducationUniversity of Chicago+1 more: $25,000 · EducationCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $12,037 · HealthSummit Volunteer First Aid Squad Inc: $5,000 · Health
Other$880,000Education$780,474Health$17,037

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $565,343 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PINGRY CORPORATION: $120,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $70,131 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $12,037 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSummit Volunteer First Aid Squad Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE PINGRY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Summit Volunteer First Aid Squad Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Timothy E and Melissa M Moriarty Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Timothy E and Melissa M Moriarty Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Trustees of Boston College: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Timothy E and Melissa M Moriarty Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Timothy E and Melissa M Moriarty Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Timothy E and Melissa M Moriarty’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home