Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Thomas & Elsie Deeley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$695kRecreation & Sports$100
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
$7,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL CONNECTICUT$20,126
SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY$11,525
WORCHESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE$10,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$9,500
SO CONNECTICUT STATE UNIV$8,033
WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$7,500
MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE$7,500
ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY$7,500
ECSU FOUNDATION INC$7,350
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOESPH$5,000
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON$2,250
PROVIDENCE COLLEGE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOSTON COLLEGE: $10k → 7%WORCHESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $15k → 11%STONEHILL COLLEGE - MERKERT TRACEY: $11k → 11%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $12k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON: $7k → 13%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $8k → 11%ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 18%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY: $12k → 9%ECSU FOUNDATION INC: $7k → 11%UNIV OF CONNECTICUT: $45k → 11%MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE: $11k → 9%BOSTON COLLEGE: $5k → 7%WORCHESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $10k → 11%STONEHILL COLLEGE - MERKERT TRACEY: $10k → 11%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $12k → 16%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $5k → 11%ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 18%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%WESTERN CONNECTICUT: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOESPH: $5k → 11%UNIV OF CONNECTICUT: $34k → 11%SO CONNECTICUT STATE UNIV: $14k → 12%MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE: $8k → 9%STONEHILL COLLEGE - MERKERT TRACEY: $9k → 11%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $5k → 11%WESTERN CONNECTICUT: $5k → 9%UNIV OF CONNECTICUT: $34k → 11%SO CONNECTICUT STATE UNIV: $12k → 12%MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE: $8k → 9%STONEHILL COLLEGE - MERKERT TRACEY: $8k → 11%WESTERN CONNECTICUT: $5k → 9%UNIV OF CONNECTICUT: $19k → 11%SO CONNECTICUT STATE UNIV: $10k → 12%STONEHILL COLLEGE - MERKERT TRACEY: $8k → 11%WESTERN CONNECTICUT: $5k → 9%UNIV OF CONNECTICUT: $13k → 11%SO CONNECTICUT STATE UNIV: $10k → 12%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $30k → 9%UNIV OF CONNECTICUT: $12k → 11%SO CONNECTICUT STATE UNIV: $9k → 12%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $30k → 9%SO CONNECTICUT STATE UNIV: $8k → 12%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $27k → 9%SO CONNECTICUT STATE UNIV: $6k → 12%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $17k → 9%SO CONNECTICUT STATE UNIV: $6k → 12%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
SC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$670k · 19 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
4

Total granted

$670k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+29%

Still filing today

58%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Fairfield University
    5× · 2020–2024 · $111k · revenue +54%
  • PA
    President and Fellows of Middlebury College
    3× · 2023–2025 · $26k · revenue +12%
  • WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • CC
    COASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • RD
    RAY DONNELLY SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
4
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
5
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
12
The President and Trustees of Colby College

to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sacred Heart University Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Co Sports Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $160,315 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSO CONNECTICUT STATE UNIV — $76,165 · OtherSO CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVCENTRAL CONNECTICUT — $66,732 · OtherCENTRAL CONNECTICUTSTONEHILL COLLEGE - MERKERT TRACEY — $44,133 · OtherSTONEHILL COLLEGE - MERKERT TRACEYWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE — $25,000 · OtherWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTETRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $24,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $21,000 · Other+8 more — $50,415 · Other+8 moreFairfield University — $110,954 · EducationFairfield UniversityPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $26,250 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Middlebury C…University of Scranton — $18,000 · EducationUniversity of ScrantonRensselaer Polytechnic Institute — $17,500 · EducationRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $14,250 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGEST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY — $12,500 · EducationST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITYSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED — $11,525 · EducationPROVIDENCE COLLEGE — $8,000 · EducationWilliams College — $8,000 · EducationCO SPORTS ACADEMY — $100 · Recreation & Sports
Other$467,760Education$226,979Recreation & Sports$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFairfield University — $110,954 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $26,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Scranton — $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute — $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $14,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED — $11,525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetECSU FOUNDATION INC — $11,025 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCO SPORTS ACADEMY — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fairfield University
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College
  • Who funds WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds University of Scranton
  • Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
  • Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED
  • Who funds ECSU FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE
  • Who funds Williams College
  • Who funds CO SPORTS ACADEMY

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Thomas & Elsie Deeley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute6% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College2% of income from government
  • Fairfield University1% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College0% of income from government
  • Sacred Heart University Incorporated0% of income from government
  • Williams College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Thomas & Elsie Deeley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Thomas & Elsie Deeley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph